41
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
42
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: 14/05/2024 06:47:03 »
last-ditch attempt sounds quite correct to me
https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/may/14/ministers-mount-last-ditch-attempt-to-save-eu-laws-on-restoring-nature
https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/may/14/ministers-mount-last-ditch-attempt-to-save-eu-laws-on-restoring-nature
43
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: 14/05/2024 06:42:34 »
Stuck in a game, without a future
44
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: 14/05/2024 06:38:51 »
Your hi tech taken to its extreme will make this planet an impoverished spaceship, all preconditions for its health gone. It's not built on hi tech, CPU's and GPU's. It's a biochemical wonder that you're killing. And the reason for us existing. without it you won't survive.
45
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: 14/05/2024 06:33:27 »
You only want to change the fuel, but only if it doesn't impact on you.
46
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: 14/05/2024 06:30:51 »
It's about a game coming to its end, a game that's totally disconnected from this planet. As it looks today you don't want to change a thing, not if it gets your 'living standards' involved. And for those poorer looking at you, they just want the same. What it means is an extinction event coming
47
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: 14/05/2024 06:25:37 »
And they interact, what those studies looked at, it all does. As with Japan now finding around half its population allergic. And it doesn't state that the reason for it is about Japan, it's global, driven by winds, streams, oceans, trade and more
48
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: 14/05/2024 06:22:45 »
We need to take several steps backward, not forward but backwards to get it right. It's not about physics studies, new idiotic ideas of 'Hi-tech' saving this planet. It's about you, this planet and your kids.
49
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: 14/05/2024 06:20:28 »
Take the Haber Bosch process, disappearing topsoil, its microbiology declining, pesticides, micro plastics, new chemicals, industrial mono farming, further deforestation's and urbanization's
https://news.mongabay.com/2024/03/pollution-poses-big-risks-to-global-clean-water-supplies-study-shows/
https://news.mongabay.com/2024/03/pollution-poses-big-risks-to-global-clean-water-supplies-study-shows/
50
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: 14/05/2024 06:14:27 »
Take trades and pollution's, that GDP and that American dream. And then yourself and your expectations, depending on where you live.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/04/240408183821.htm
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/04/240408183821.htm
51
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: 13/05/2024 17:26:43 »
It is kind of strange, but also proving a point, that we live inside our minds. The way I get happy about physics while still knowing that we're going to an extinction event.
Most of you should do the same, or probably all of us to some degree. But it seems you're thinking it's a sci fi, with Captain Kirk and Scotty ready to step in to solve it for us.
Most of you should do the same, or probably all of us to some degree. But it seems you're thinking it's a sci fi, with Captain Kirk and Scotty ready to step in to solve it for us.
52
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: 13/05/2024 17:01:13 »
And it is kind of funny because it relates to one of those ideas I've been playing around with in this essay. The one asking yourself if it is possible to transfer energy, f.ex to a space ship, it's fuel entangled with some/thing/where on Earth. And what it would mean if it was possible? 'Meaningful' information being transferred, or not?
53
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: 13/05/2024 16:51:32 »
What one can argue against it is the idea of getting the entanglement broken, by outer circumstances. If it breaks the entanglement you are left with two unique particles, instead of an entanglement.
54
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: 13/05/2024 16:47:06 »
If you show me a spoonful of negative energy I might change my mind, but until then I'll stand by my words. Spontaneous pair productions, even if they might annihilate each other do not, themselves, consist of negative energy, and they might produce photons and other particles in their annihilation, yes, but no 'negative energy/photons/particles', well, as far as I know?
55
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: 13/05/2024 16:24:05 »
So I called 'energy' a 'coin of exchange' which I have to thank JP for. then I stated that you only can give it one sign, which is the way I look at it, even though you mathematically can treat it differently. Which made me state that the idea of 'negative energy' eating up mass inside a black hole becoming something of a magical idea to me. But there is another way around it. Those particles that separates are entangled, where the one in-falling might be able to 'teleport' energy to it's other part. Which then would allow that black hole to lose mass.
There is support for that one in this experiment I think
https://www.quantamagazine.org/physicists-use-quantum-mechanics-to-pull-energy-out-of-nothing-20230222/
There is support for that one in this experiment I think
https://www.quantamagazine.org/physicists-use-quantum-mechanics-to-pull-energy-out-of-nothing-20230222/
56
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: 13/05/2024 10:18:31 »
Timescales, ours versus natures
You're a fool to ignore them
You're a fool to ignore them
57
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: 13/05/2024 10:14:52 »
Everyone is part of this game
58
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: 13/05/2024 10:12:52 »
Some media will pat themselves on the back I'm sure, but as they couldn't keep themselves free from official pressures it doesn't mean a thing.
59
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: 13/05/2024 10:10:37 »
Considering the values, beliefs, ideologies, religions etc, we show today it won't happen though. So that is what you will meet around 2040, and you will start your really big and ferocious blame games at approximately the same time. Because that is when I expect it to hit us, in the West, just as bad as it already hits others.
syntax
syntax
60
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: 13/05/2024 10:05:45 »
It doesn't really matter if a total fossil ban to 2040 will wreck another type of havoc with us, it's still better than the one above. Not for you maybe but for your kids.