0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
further investigation
Further research is needed
but more must be done
"The National Institutes of Health (NIH), a part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, is the nation’s medical research agency — making important discoveries that improve health and save lives."
you're remarkably LAZY as well.
evidence of O3's antioxidant capabilities
Exposure of about 60 s exhibited 99.9% killing efficiency, but exposure for such a long period showed degradation of saliva proteins.
Dentistry....MRSA...Diabetes
So, you really think they would present Glowing Verbiage
Months ago I began researching this topic, and NIH studies came up, more and more since I first looked; NONE of which had NEGATIVE things to say about applying Ozone to various, serious Health issues, all of which said More research is needed to make these assertions stronger.
I didn't realize this was a Political Site; I thought it was for Scientists, for Inquiring, Inquisitive Minds.
So your point is What? All NIH articles expressing positive findings RE Ozone Therapies are Wholy-Invalid, just because you found a Retraction of one of their papers that has Absolutely Nothing to Do with Ozone Therapy?and that WE should put our minds in the sole hands of your precious Cockcrane Library, instead?NIH's Retraction Proves My POINT, not yours, Boring. Thank you for evidencing that NIH retracts things unworthy of NIH's de facto endorsement, by virtue of its publication on their website.Keep up the Good Work, Boring.