21
New Theories / Re: Has a logical presumption misdirected science down a cul-de-sac?
« on: 01/02/2020 16:49:27 »
Thanks for your numerous replies. In answer, I summarise my position.
In the SCIENCE BASED THEORY OF CREATION post, if the polarity inversion proposal ‘carries’, we get a seductive and long awaited definition of Gravity which, in turn, suggests an ongoing creation of Hydrogen throughout infinity.
Ongoing throughout infinity suggests an electromagnetic field (aka infinity) suffused with H growing ever bigger and hotter until an inevitable Big Bang.
This suffusion was infinite so it spewed out enough material to furnish the Universe we evolved into via 160,000,000 years of dinosaur evolution.
The post proposes this returns science to the logical physics of Newton and Galileo, but there are acres of Quantum disciples who vociferously disagree.
My only request to the ‘vociferous’ is that your opinions begin with your own pre Big Bang theories
Rstormview
In the SCIENCE BASED THEORY OF CREATION post, if the polarity inversion proposal ‘carries’, we get a seductive and long awaited definition of Gravity which, in turn, suggests an ongoing creation of Hydrogen throughout infinity.
Ongoing throughout infinity suggests an electromagnetic field (aka infinity) suffused with H growing ever bigger and hotter until an inevitable Big Bang.
This suffusion was infinite so it spewed out enough material to furnish the Universe we evolved into via 160,000,000 years of dinosaur evolution.
The post proposes this returns science to the logical physics of Newton and Galileo, but there are acres of Quantum disciples who vociferously disagree.
My only request to the ‘vociferous’ is that your opinions begin with your own pre Big Bang theories
Rstormview