1
New Theories / Re: Does science assume aether
« on: 09/12/2022 15:16:39 »
Do you think that Einstein's understanding of light in 1905 is better than 1916?
Thank you for the information . Einstein understood physics and light but couldn't quite ''put his finger on it '' .
He was correct about lights constant speed but didn't realise this has dependencies . Lights speed is a consequence of the A(x) operator as already mentioned in another thread . Einstein put space-time ''into the picture'' but didn't link the dependency of the reference frame to lights speed .
Light requires a quantum bridge between positions before it can change position . If there is no quantum bridge the light is conserved by the space rather than travelling .
Space-time isn't expanding , it is growing , as interior energy finds its way to the edge of space-time , it becomes conserved at the outer edge by the space , growing space-time .
Space-time can be viewed as a quantum mainframe which is volume of quantum bridges A(x) .
From any position within space-time , any receding vector can be considered A(x) , an Eigen vector .
The lesser the energy occupying the vector , the more the gravitational force..
Hence Ψ/A(x)
A(x) the operator , explains gravity , lights speed and the motion of orbiting bodies .