The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. expanding universe
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

expanding universe

  • 22 Replies
  • 19628 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ukmicky (OP)

  • Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • *****
  • 3065
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 7 times
    • http://www.space-talk.com/
Re: expanding universe
« Reply #20 on: 12/08/2005 02:42:03 »
gsmollin
I was trying to congratulate you on all your efforts towards this forum, In my own sort of way.
You haven’t offended. In fact keep up the good work. As i said its good to have a source you can trust.
The err part was just a question. Nothing meant by it. [:I][:)]

« Last Edit: 13/08/2005 01:18:46 by ukmicky »
Logged
 



Offline David Sparkman

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 234
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: expanding universe
« Reply #21 on: 16/08/2005 03:42:22 »
Thanks for the answer on the red shift number. What I was considering was defined on one of the web sites as:

"The Gravitational Redshift is a shift in the frequency of a photon to lower energy as it climbs out of a gravitational field."

If we assume that Neutron stars come in various gravitational levels, some being not quite newtron stars, we could see red sifts all the way up to almost a singularity at which point the red shift approches infinity as the star approaches a singularity (black hole).

I don't see how the scientists can rule out this posibility, and if not, how they can prove the very large numbers they get on the expansion. The NStar mode takes no great leap of faith to believe, and is established science. The super fast expanding universe producing such red shifts is asking us to reject the simple explaination, and accept a much more complex one.

David
Logged
David
 

Offline vanvinhhoang

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 10
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: expanding universe
« Reply #22 on: 04/09/2005 11:31:45 »
In my opinion, an obvious explanation for our expanding universal no come soon. Because our space communicative technology is just at the biginning, and i have a abit ridiculous ideal is that it maybe cause of our understanding about gravity and the another forces is still not full.  I believe when we gain the theore of the unification every our current problems will solve, ofcouse consisting of this explanation
Logged
 
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.279 seconds with 32 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.