chicken AND fish :-)

RD · « **on:** 01/12/2009 23:47:06 »

. [ Invalid Attachment ]

http://www.flightglobal.com

Mr. Scientist · « **Reply #1 on:** 01/12/2009 23:52:33 »

Quote from: RD on 01/12/2009 23:47:06

. [ Invalid Attachment ]

http://www.flightglobal.com

Yeh, most unfortunate for us to laugh at other peoples expenses.

RD · « **Reply #2 on:** 02/12/2009 00:00:08 »

Quote from: Mr. Scientist on 01/12/2009 23:52:33

Yeh, most unfortunate for us to laugh at other peoples expenses.

The guy sitting next to Mr Chicken&Fish was certainly unfortunate, (particularly if an emergency evacuation was necessary).

Mr C&F should have booked two seats: one for each buttock.

Mr. Scientist · « **Reply #3 on:** 02/12/2009 00:06:46 »

YES... how the obvious must have escaped me...

Geezer · « **Reply #4 on:** 02/12/2009 06:06:49 »

That's 'cos he's sitting on the armrest.

I can't imagine they would take off with him like that. Presumably they did give him two seats.

neilep · « **Reply #5 on:** 02/12/2009 11:41:48 »

There's no way he'd be able to wear a safety belt for a start !

Nizzle · « **Reply #6 on:** 02/12/2009 13:07:10 »

Maybe it's a midget plane with just one normal person on it..

Mr. Scientist · « **Reply #7 on:** 02/12/2009 13:19:33 »

Quote from: Nizzle on 02/12/2009 13:07:10

Maybe it's a midget plane with just one normal person on it..

Ah yes.. this is more better.

Geezer · « **Reply #8 on:** 02/12/2009 18:26:40 »

Quote from: neilep on 02/12/2009 11:41:48

There's no way he'd be able to wear a safety belt for a start !

No problem. They have extensions for that.

Bored chemist · « **Reply #9 on:** 02/12/2009 18:43:52 »

Would someone like to explain why I (all 68Kg of me) got charged for my bags being a few kilos over the limit?

DrN · « **Reply #10 on:** 02/12/2009 21:52:24 »

I'm sure I heard somewhere that one carrier (hmm, let me see, could it have been Ryanair) was considering charging excess weight for hefty passengers, as they recognise that the total baggage/person load on the plane was greater for these people, so why should normal sized passengers suffer? Or maybe it was just another way of getting more money out of people? I don't think they were letting slim people take more luggage.

Geezer · « **Reply #11 on:** 02/12/2009 22:16:09 »

Quote from: DrN on 02/12/2009 21:52:24

I'm sure I heard somewhere that one carrier (hmm, let me see, could it have been Ryanair) was considering charging excess weight for hefty passengers, as they recognise that the total baggage/person load on the plane was greater for these people, so why should normal sized passengers suffer? Or maybe it was just another way of getting more money out of people? I don't think they were letting slim people take more luggage.

I think some US airlines planned to require some passenegers to buy two seats, but I'm not sure if they ever implemented it.

chicken AND fish :-)

RD (OP)

chicken AND fish :-)

Mr. Scientist

chicken AND fish :-)

RD (OP)

chicken AND fish :-)

Mr. Scientist

chicken AND fish :-)

Geezer

chicken AND fish :-)

neilep

chicken AND fish :-)

Nizzle

chicken AND fish :-)

Mr. Scientist

chicken AND fish :-)

Geezer

chicken AND fish :-)

Bored chemist

chicken AND fish :-)

DrN

chicken AND fish :-)

Geezer

chicken AND fish :-)

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png