chicken AND fish :-)

  • 11 Replies
  • 3277 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

*

Offline RD

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 8172
    • View Profile
chicken AND fish :-)
« on: 01/12/2009 23:47:06 »
.[attachment=10743]

http://www.flightglobal.com



*

Offline Mr. Scientist

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1451
  • http://www.facebook.com/#/profile.php?ref=profile&
    • View Profile
    • Time Theory
chicken AND fish :-)
« Reply #1 on: 01/12/2009 23:52:33 »
.[attachment=10743]

http://www.flightglobal.com




Yeh, most unfortunate for us to laugh at other peoples expenses.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZGcNx8nV8U

''God could not have had much time on His hands when he formed the Planck Lengths.''

 ̿ ̿ ̿ ̿̿'\̵͇̿̿\=(●̪•)=/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿̿̿ ̿ ̿̿ ̿ ̿

٩๏̯͡๏۶

*

Offline RD

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 8172
    • View Profile
chicken AND fish :-)
« Reply #2 on: 02/12/2009 00:00:08 »
Yeh, most unfortunate for us to laugh at other peoples expenses.

The guy sitting next to Mr Chicken&Fish was certainly unfortunate, (particularly if an emergency evacuation was necessary).

Mr C&F should have booked two seats: one for each buttock.
« Last Edit: 02/12/2009 00:04:36 by RD »

*

Offline Mr. Scientist

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1451
  • http://www.facebook.com/#/profile.php?ref=profile&
    • View Profile
    • Time Theory
chicken AND fish :-)
« Reply #3 on: 02/12/2009 00:06:46 »
YES... how the obvious must have escaped me...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZGcNx8nV8U

''God could not have had much time on His hands when he formed the Planck Lengths.''

 ̿ ̿ ̿ ̿̿'\̵͇̿̿\=(●̪•)=/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿̿̿ ̿ ̿̿ ̿ ̿

٩๏̯͡๏۶

*

Offline Geezer

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 8328
  • "Vive la résistance!"
    • View Profile
chicken AND fish :-)
« Reply #4 on: 02/12/2009 06:06:49 »
That's 'cos he's sitting on the armrest.

I can't imagine they would take off with him like that. Presumably they did give him two seats.
There ain'ta no sanity clause, and there ain'ta no centrifugal force ćther.

*

Offline neilep

  • Withdrawnmist
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 20602
    • View Profile
chicken AND fish :-)
« Reply #5 on: 02/12/2009 11:41:48 »
There's no way he'd be able to wear a safety belt for a start !


« Last Edit: 02/12/2009 13:22:03 by neilep »
Men are the same as women, just inside out !

*

Offline Nizzle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 964
  • Extropian by choice!
    • View Profile
    • Carnivorous Plants
chicken AND fish :-)
« Reply #6 on: 02/12/2009 13:07:10 »
Maybe it's a midget plane with just one normal person on it..
Roses are red,
Violets are blue.
Most poems rhyme,
but this one doesn't

*

Offline Mr. Scientist

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1451
  • http://www.facebook.com/#/profile.php?ref=profile&
    • View Profile
    • Time Theory
chicken AND fish :-)
« Reply #7 on: 02/12/2009 13:19:33 »
Maybe it's a midget plane with just one normal person on it..

Ah yes.. this is more better.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZGcNx8nV8U

''God could not have had much time on His hands when he formed the Planck Lengths.''

 ̿ ̿ ̿ ̿̿'\̵͇̿̿\=(●̪•)=/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿̿̿ ̿ ̿̿ ̿ ̿

٩๏̯͡๏۶

*

Offline Geezer

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 8328
  • "Vive la résistance!"
    • View Profile
chicken AND fish :-)
« Reply #8 on: 02/12/2009 18:26:40 »
There's no way he'd be able to wear a safety belt for a start !




No problem. They have extensions for that.
There ain'ta no sanity clause, and there ain'ta no centrifugal force ćther.

*

Offline Bored chemist

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 8750
    • View Profile
chicken AND fish :-)
« Reply #9 on: 02/12/2009 18:43:52 »
Would someone like to explain why I (all 68Kg of me) got charged for my bags being a few kilos over the limit?
Please disregard all previous signatures.

*

Offline DrN

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 815
    • View Profile
chicken AND fish :-)
« Reply #10 on: 02/12/2009 21:52:24 »
I'm sure I heard somewhere that one carrier (hmm, let me see, could it have been Ryanair) was considering charging excess weight for hefty passengers, as they recognise that the total baggage/person load on the plane was greater for these people, so why should normal sized passengers suffer? Or maybe it was just another way of getting more money out of people? I don't think they were letting slim people take more luggage.

*

Offline Geezer

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 8328
  • "Vive la résistance!"
    • View Profile
chicken AND fish :-)
« Reply #11 on: 02/12/2009 22:16:09 »
I'm sure I heard somewhere that one carrier (hmm, let me see, could it have been Ryanair) was considering charging excess weight for hefty passengers, as they recognise that the total baggage/person load on the plane was greater for these people, so why should normal sized passengers suffer? Or maybe it was just another way of getting more money out of people? I don't think they were letting slim people take more luggage.

I think some US airlines planned to require some passenegers to buy two seats, but I'm not sure if they ever implemented it.
There ain'ta no sanity clause, and there ain'ta no centrifugal force ćther.