The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. what is the responsible factor of making earth pole and what is anti gravity , ?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

what is the responsible factor of making earth pole and what is anti gravity , ?

  • 4 Replies
  • 5088 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline shashipal_dadra (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 2
  • Activity:
    0%
what is the responsible factor of making earth pole and what is anti gravity , ?
« on: 01/01/2010 13:47:38 »
can we shield the gravitational field?
Logged
 



Offline graham.d

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2207
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
what is the responsible factor of making earth pole and what is anti gravity , ?
« Reply #1 on: 02/01/2010 00:21:43 »
Not sure what you mean by "earth pole".

"Can we shield the gravitational field" - No. At least not if we believe the physics we know today. If gravity is the result of curvature in spade-time, there is no "shield" that can be conceived of that would work. I believe it would also allow for energy to be extracted from nowhere.
Logged
 

Offline Ron Hughes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 363
  • Activity:
    0%
what is the responsible factor of making earth pole and what is anti gravity , ?
« Reply #2 on: 02/01/2010 01:57:13 »
The key word is " If ". Since the scientific community doesn't have a clue as to what mechanism gravity uses I would have to conclude that a shield could still be possible. Grabbing at a graviton straw is joke.
Logged
From a drop of water a logician could infer the possibility of an Atlantic or a Niagara without having seen or heard of one or the other. Sherlock Holmes.
 

Offline Geezer

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 8314
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 8 times
  • "Vive la résistance!"
what is the responsible factor of making earth pole and what is anti gravity , ?
« Reply #3 on: 02/01/2010 02:09:52 »
Ahem!

The New Year is but a day old. Let's try to respect each other's opinions, at least through the end of January  [:D]

(Geez - Mod)
Logged
There ain'ta no sanity clause, and there ain'ta no centrifugal force æther.
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 81446
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 178 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
what is the responsible factor of making earth pole and what is anti gravity , ?
« Reply #4 on: 04/01/2010 22:44:11 »
1. Gravitons are a result of treating everything as 'forces' coming from the work that's made on describing photons in quantum electrodynamics. "In order to do this gravitons have to be always-attractive (gravity never pushes), work over any distance (gravity is universal) and come in unlimited numbers (to provide high strengths near stars). In quantum theory, this defines an even- spin (spin 2 in this case) boson with a rest mass of zero."

Gravitons are a concept used in M-Theory and SuperString theory and there seen as a closed one dimensional string vibrating at a low energy.

 M theory

2. Another way to look at gravity is to assume that it is space 'wrinkling itself' due to mass, like space becoming an invisible roller coaster 'dipping' around the concentration of mass and motion/acceleration.

3. A third way is the Higgs field, which to me seems to be working flawlessly with (2) too, where gravitation is seen as something accumulating/becoming attracted around mass, to me it becomes a sort of mirror image to (2).

Higgs field

And that's the ones I know of, that's mainstream today?

The only way to possibly be able to shield yourself seems to be if it was a 'force' (1) but then you probably would need something 'exotic' not really belonging to our SpaceTime. If it was (2) you can't shield it. If it is (3) then I don't see how you can shield yourself either?

Maybe you're thinking of electromagnetism's as possible 'carriers' of gravity, as you ask about 'Earth poles'? I don't think so myself but I know that there are people thinking in those terms.
« Last Edit: 04/01/2010 22:48:52 by yor_on »
Logged
URGENT:  Naked Scientists website is under threat.    https://www.thenakedscientists.com/sos-cambridge-university-killing-dr-chris

"BOMB DISPOSAL EXPERT. If you see me running, try to keep up."
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.295 seconds with 45 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.