The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. That CAN'T be true!
  4. Infinity?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down

Infinity?

  • 53 Replies
  • 29381 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline simeonie (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 351
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Infinity?
« Reply #40 on: 15/07/2005 21:44:41 »
well I personally can not see how there can be an end, although it is mind boggling how it could be infinite but that is only because we have never seen something infinite.

The universe is sort of growing at the speed of light because of the light travelling outwards away from it's source

----------------------
-__- my website!!!!
http://www.simeonie.co.uk
has forums too!
Think about it! lolz
Logged
----------------------
MY NAME IS NOT REALLY SIMEONIE IT IS SIMON!!!
 



Offline chimera

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 475
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Infinity?
« Reply #41 on: 22/07/2005 11:58:22 »
quote:
Originally posted by Sandwalker


It may even be a singularity (consider the experience of the photon travelling at C) and what we perceive as dimensions is just that a perception of some change of parameter of said singularity.




Nicely put. Makes me think tho that it's funny how close that comes to age-old mystic thinking that everything in existence are just different aspects of one underlying truth or deity if you wish.

Problem is that even if it is true, which I do not rule out, it does not tell us much more than that... it does not explain anything, I'm afraid. And maybe it cannot be known, by us at least, since we are bound to a limited number of those dimensions, and get into trouble and headaches if we try to imagine more of them at the same time than we have fingers on our hand. Like chickens hardwired only to be able to count up to four or so. To them anything after that it just 'many'.
Logged
Errare humanum esd.-- Biggus D.
 

Offline kenshin

  • First timers
  • *
  • 3
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Infinity?
« Reply #42 on: 28/08/2005 17:33:32 »
Our universe(or space) is just like a balloon.If you(or light) starts travling from one point, then you can go around and around forever. In this sense, our universe is infinite, but just like a balloon is finite,our universe is also finite.For more detailes,one can check "A breif history of time" by Stephen hakwins.
Logged
 
 

Offline David Sparkman

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 234
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Infinity?
« Reply #43 on: 30/08/2005 04:34:54 »
This is a theory to explain the uncomprehendable. Those who want to opt out may do so until the next uncomprehendable theory surfaces.

Hawkins believes that gravity has formed a bubble of a universe but has nothing to say about what is beyond, because in his world there is no beyond. We are a bubble in the middle of nothingness, and we cannot comprehend anything outside of our bubble.

Argument with Hawkins is not possible because of the way the rules are written. It is kind of like being told no by your mother and you ask why and she says simply "because".

Personally, although the math is so very tidy, I hope for something a little more meaningful than being a hicup in nothingness.

David
Logged
David
 

Dr. Praetoria

  • Guest
Re: Infinity?
« Reply #44 on: 01/09/2005 23:17:30 »
A worm crawling on the surface of an apple, may think it lives in an infinite universe.  How do we differ from this, living in 4-d space-time?
Doc
Logged
 



Offline David Sparkman

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 234
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Infinity?
« Reply #45 on: 04/09/2005 04:56:51 »
A poor analogy, first parts of worms like the insides of apples, I can attest to that as I have found parts of worms inside apples I have bitten (yeech).

Second, it is not man's nature to accept that he cannot know, and cannot learn. Worms are dumb for leaving their parts inside apples (lol).

David
Logged
David
 

Offline neilep

  • Withdrawnmist
  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21211
  • Activity:
    1%
  • Thanked: 119 times
Re: Infinity?
« Reply #46 on: 04/09/2005 07:04:46 »
I'd just like to point out at this juncture that my wife has very nice dimensions.

Men are the same as women.... just inside out !!
Logged
Men are the same as Women, just inside out !
 

Offline GruesomeGabe

  • First timers
  • *
  • 1
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Infinity?
« Reply #47 on: 06/10/2005 19:42:10 »
the universe is expanding,(we can figure out the rate though it varys in different areas) therefore there is a set amount of space and therefore space is not infinite...  well universes are expanding... so at least within our universe it makes sence.  theory of a multiverse works just like saying from here to the wall is 10 feet  within each unit of feet or inches and so on  there is an infinity there for space is infinite just like that wall there is an infinity infinites and infinity multiverses all stacked on each other....i have been thinking about this all day and searched the web and found this site.... me thinking about this just led to more and more questions and now i am in a frustrated state of trying to figure out the concept of infinity

gabe
Logged
 
 

Offline i_have_no_idea

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 66
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Infinity?
« Reply #48 on: 12/10/2005 19:58:24 »
From the big bang the universe just kept expanding at phenomenal speeds. From then on it will keep expanding until it gets to large and collapses on it's self (some scientists think).

I have heard but am not sure that the universe is about 150 billion light-years wide.
Logged
"Ideas are more powerful than guns. We would not let our enemies have guns, why should we let them have ideas." -Joseph Stalin
 



Offline simeonie (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 351
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Infinity?
« Reply #49 on: 13/10/2005 22:27:13 »
well no one actually knows whether it is infinite or not we don't know. I admit there can't be an infinite ammount of mass though because it would mean infinite gravity this the universe collapsing in on itself. BUT there could be a TOTAL vacuum though for the rest of infinitey. I can not understand how there could be an end. I mean if there is an end like a wall or something there must be something on the other side of the wall. Ya know what I mean?

----------------------
http://www.simeonie.co.uk
Check it out. Click on the forums
Logged
----------------------
MY NAME IS NOT REALLY SIMEONIE IT IS SIMON!!!
 

Offline socratus

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Infinity?
« Reply #50 on: 06/12/2005 13:51:02 »
Infinity: a symbol or reality.
1. Everyone knows, that absolute temperature T=0K cannot be reached.
We can only indefinitely come nearer to her.
2. Everyone knows, that nobody can reach
absolute speed of quantum of light  c=1.
We can only indefinitely come nearer to her.
3. But everyone also knows, that only quantum of light goes with
absolute speed  c=1.
It is the fact, it is a reality.
Question: Unless can this absolute movement  c=1 occur in  relative reference frame ?
Answer: No.!
The absolute movement can occur only in absolute frame of reference.
But only one absolute  frame of reference is known  T=0K
(which  is impossible to reach).  
And only in her quantum of light can move with the absolute speed  c=1.
 And it is also reality.
But what can tell quantum of light about his travel in the parallel world?
*      *     *
Best regards.
Socratus.
http://www.socratus.com
Logged
The secret of 'God' and 'Existence' hide
 in the “Theory of Light quanta”.
 

Offline DoctorBeaver

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12653
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
Re: Infinity?
« Reply #51 on: 06/12/2005 14:37:11 »
quote:
the universe is expanding,(we can figure out the rate though it varys in different areas) therefore there is a set amount of space and therefore space is not infinite


We can't actually say that. All we can say is that the observable universe is expanding. Maybe beyond that it is actually static or even contracting.
Logged
 

Offline simeonie (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 351
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Infinity?
« Reply #52 on: 14/12/2005 17:16:29 »
I think this is one of those questions that cannot be answered because there is just no way of proving.

----------------------
http://www.simeonie.co.uk
Check it out. Click on the forums
Logged
----------------------
MY NAME IS NOT REALLY SIMEONIE IT IS SIMON!!!
 



Offline DoctorBeaver

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12653
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
Re: Infinity?
« Reply #53 on: 14/12/2005 17:34:35 »
quote:
I think this is one of those questions that cannot be answered because there is just no way of proving.


Precisely
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.76 seconds with 63 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.