[samcottle (OP)]

Yeah, roughly. It's undergone quite a bit of refinement since then. It could possibly do with finessing a bit further, but I think I'm more or less ready to put it in book form and publish it (and then have no one read it).

[Origin]

Fully explaining my theory here is somewhat beyond the scope of this post

That's good.  A full explanation of how electron density is gravity would probably blowup everyone bologna meters...

[Bored chemist]

Fully explaining my theory here is somewhat beyond the scope of this post

I'm pretty sure that puts this thread on the wrong side of the rules.
Certainly, many fora require that the discussion takes place  without having to go to other sites to see what the question is.

Posting "this is true, but I'm not explaining why" is too close to preaching.

[Kryptid]

I'm pretty sure that puts this thread on the wrong side of the rules.
Certainly, many fora require that the discussion takes place  without having to go to other sites to see what the question is.

Posting "this is true, but I'm not explaining why" is too close to preaching.

He has another thread where he does explain his thoughts on that: https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=70600.msg516449#msg516449

I plan on reading it and posting my subsequent responses about his gravity ideas there. The radiation pressure and and black hole stuff is fine to keep discussing here.

As an aside, I want to apologize to samcottle for what he took to be a condescending comment. I see now, after looking at his other thread, that his comment about gravity being made of electrons isn't what I thought it originally meant.