The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Non continuous theoretical device for break the law of conservation of energy
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Non continuous theoretical device for break the law of conservation of energy

  • 23 Replies
  • 5314 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline LB7 (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 454
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 5 times
  • Ludovic Bavay Ubeda
Re: Non continuous theoretical device for break the law of conservation of energy
« Reply #20 on: 09/10/2017 21:58:26 »
My device is massless just because I need to simplify the calculations. I can set a mass for all parts. But like that it is easier to find my error. If you say what you didn't understand I can explain. It is like gravity but I can change the orientation.  It is a theoretical device.
Logged
Ludovic Bavay 19011971 Valenciennes
 



Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: Non continuous theoretical device for break the law of conservation of energy
« Reply #21 on: 10/10/2017 02:45:34 »
Quote from: jeffreyH on 09/10/2017 21:17:33
Ahem! A photon is massless. A photon has energy. You could argue it has relativistic mass.

I know that a photon has no rest mass (or invariant mass, if you prefer). Relativistic mass is indeed along the lines of what I was thinking.
« Last Edit: 10/10/2017 06:08:39 by Kryptid »
Logged
 

Offline LB7 (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 454
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 5 times
  • Ludovic Bavay Ubeda
Re: Non continuous theoretical device for break the law of conservation of energy
« Reply #22 on: 11/10/2017 07:50:12 »
The device with the white disk (or another shape) fixed to the ground:

1/ the energy from the walls is constant
2/ the potential energy at start and at final are constant
3/ the potential energy to move out/in the layer 1/2 is constant (the sum of in + out = zero)
4/ I have THE CHOICE to move out any layer I want, but the pressure is NOT THE SAME so how the sum of energy could be constant ?

https://i.imgur.com/PnZEnq5.png

* def.png (36.14 kB, 941x469 - viewed 234 times.)
« Last Edit: 11/10/2017 09:04:47 by LB7 »
Logged
Ludovic Bavay 19011971 Valenciennes
 

Offline LB7 (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 454
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 5 times
  • Ludovic Bavay Ubeda
Re: Non continuous theoretical device for break the law of conservation of energy
« Reply #23 on: 13/10/2017 07:36:53 »
I don't need to follow the principle of last action ! I have the choice. Only one energy is not fixed, the sum of energy is not constant.
Logged
Ludovic Bavay 19011971 Valenciennes
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.506 seconds with 30 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.