[Bored chemist]

You think it is not true that the Earth's field protects the Earth from solar winds and harmful radiation?

The Earth's atmosphere and the magnetic field do that.
So there's no need for your made up N field.

But that magnetic field is Neutral in charge is it not ?  A N-field?

It's impossible to tell if it's an N field or not because you have yet to explain what one is.
Every time someone asks you draw meaningless pictures or present nonsensical broken equations.
For what it's worth, an electric field, a magnetic field and a gravitational flied are all neutral- they have no net charge.
So that, by your logic makes them all N fields.
But they are clearly different.
As I said- you make no sense.

[guest39538]

You think it is not true that the Earth's field protects the Earth from solar winds and harmful radiation?

The Earth's atmosphere and the magnetic field do that.
So there's no need for your made up N field.

But that magnetic field is Neutral in charge is it not ?  A N-field?

It's impossible to tell if it's an N field or not because you have yet to explain what one is.
Every time someone asks you draw meaningless pictures or present nonsensical broken equations.
For what it's worth, an electric field, a magnetic field and a gravitational flied are all neutral- they have no net charge.
So that, by your logic makes them all N fields.
But they are clearly different.
As I said- you make no sense.

In a united field theory. what does united mean?   A common link maybe such as they are all a N-field or to use the full word ,  a neutral field. 
I think it is quite obvious when I say A+B = N what is means Mr C.

[Bored chemist]

I think it is quite obvious when I say A+B = N what is means Mr C.

Nobody else does.

[guest39538]

I think it is quite obvious when I say A+B = N what is means Mr C.

Nobody else does.

(-e) + (+1e) = N

Yes they do , because N = 0

[guest39538]

Mr C, do I  have to explain everything?

Imagine a Higg's field that was isometric but a negative energy -e, now any point sources of the ''matrix'' would be +1e ,   +1e would be just changing  position in the field matrix , +1e being equally attracted forward as backwards.

I can approach this from lots of different angles Mr C, with boundaries and without boundaries considered.

[Bored chemist]

Yes they do , because N = 0

Why?

Mr C, do I  have to explain everything?

That depends.
If you want to be taken seriously you need to explain something. and you haven't done that yet.

On the otehr hand, if youwant to keep trolling, just accry on with this

Imagine a Higg's field that was isometric but a negative energy -e, now any point sources of the ''matrix'' would be +1e ,   +1e would be just changing  position in the field matrix , +1e being equally attracted forward as backwards.

word salad.

[The Spoon]

Mr C, do I  have to explain everything?

Imagine a Higg's field that was isometric but a negative energy -e, now any point sources of the ''matrix'' would be +1e ,   +1e would be just changing  position in the field matrix , +1e being equally attracted forward as backwards.

I can approach this from lots of different angles Mr C, with boundaries and without boundaries considered.

It would seem not when you are wittering away taliking constant crap. But then, as you pointed out, you are just here to troll.

[guest39538]

Mr C, do I  have to explain everything?

Imagine a Higg's field that was isometric but a negative energy -e, now any point sources of the ''matrix'' would be +1e ,   +1e would be just changing  position in the field matrix , +1e being equally attracted forward as backwards.

I can approach this from lots of different angles Mr C, with boundaries and without boundaries considered.

It would seem not when you are wittering away taliking constant crap. But then, as you pointed out, you are just here to troll.

Yes I am a troll, but is it my fault on my journey  I became a theoretical Physicist and got quite good at science?

Not my fault that I started liking science , it just happened.

[guest39538]

n-field enclosure.jpg (619.09 kB . 6640x3128 - viewed 2324 times)

[guest39538]

and


ne.jpg (619.08 kB . 6640x3128 - viewed 2279 times)

[Dave Lev (OP)]

You think it is not true that the Earth's field protects the Earth from solar winds and harmful radiation?

The Earth's atmosphere and the magnetic field do that.
So there's no need for your made up N field.

But that magnetic field is Neutral in charge is it not ?  A N-field?

It's impossible to tell if it's an N field or not because you have yet to explain what one is.
Every time someone asks you draw meaningless pictures or present nonsensical broken equations.
For what it's worth, an electric field, a magnetic field and a gravitational flied are all neutral- they have no net charge.
So that, by your logic makes them all N fields.
But they are clearly different.
As I said- you make no sense.

Dear Thebox
Would you kindly stop?  Enough is enough.
Your message is very clear. There is no need for your "meaningless pictures or present nonsensical broken equations."
You are more than welcome to open a new thread and set all your "brilliant" ideas

[guest39538]

You think it is not true that the Earth's field protects the Earth from solar winds and harmful radiation?

The Earth's atmosphere and the magnetic field do that.
So there's no need for your made up N field.

But that magnetic field is Neutral in charge is it not ?  A N-field?

It's impossible to tell if it's an N field or not because you have yet to explain what one is.
Every time someone asks you draw meaningless pictures or present nonsensical broken equations.
For what it's worth, an electric field, a magnetic field and a gravitational flied are all neutral- they have no net charge.
So that, by your logic makes them all N fields.
But they are clearly different.
As I said- you make no sense.

Dear Thebox
Would you kindly stop? Enough is enough.
There is no need for your "meaningless pictures or present nonsensical broken equations."
You are more than welcome to open a new thread and set all your "brilliant" ideas

My apologies to you Sir, I get carried away and forget which thread I am in.