0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I just wanted to stick my toe back in the water here and refresh my memory of posts on this thread and see if it seems right to restart posting ...
I just wanted to stick my toe back in the water here and refresh my memory of posts on this thread and see if it seems right to restart posting
That rate that quantum gravity functions (the strength of QG) is governed by the gravitational wave energy density (G-wave) profile of the local environment.
you can jump higher on the moon, because the force of gravity is lower on the moon, but the cause of the difference in the strength of quantum gravity on the Moon vs on Earth (higher G-wave at the surface of the earth than on the moon) is explained by the mechanics of the quantum gravity solution of the ISU model.
Quote from: Bogie_smiles on 08/06/2023 02:55:37I just wanted to stick my toe back in the water here and refresh my memory of posts on this thread and see if it seems right to restart posting Origin seems right. All evidence suggests that your sole purpose in posting is to watch the count of the number of google bots that note each post. You seem to live for the number and nothing else. It is an obsession to the point of being compelled to put the number at the bottom of each post to track its progress.As for the title of this topic, I didn't read it all, but I didn't actually find anywhere that attempted to convey what 'they' are saying about quantum gravity.
causing gravitational waves that eventually overlap
would the big bangs be considered to be entangled, i.e. not signaling faster than light events?
Quote from: Bogie_smiles on 14/06/2023 17:33:51causing gravitational waves that eventually overlapAny kind of waves from multiple sources will (if close enough) eventually overlap.Quotewould the big bangs be considered to be entangled, i.e. not signaling faster than light events?Entanglement isn't 'signalling faster than light'. It's a correlation of quantum measurements. It is unclear how to take a quantum measurement of something as classical as a big bang, and how one would expect to measure a different big bang in such a way that a correlation could be noted or not.
Doesn't Inflation break Entanglement?
do bring up the term "non-locality" where a system exists in two different parts, i.e. in two places in the universe at the same time.
I think entanglement implies that entangled particles can be separated and yet function as a single system.