The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Science
  3. General Science
  4. Evolution is acceptable, but not when applied to humans?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Evolution is acceptable, but not when applied to humans?

  • 1 Replies
  • 5352 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline _Stefan_ (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 814
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • My Photobucket Album
Evolution is acceptable, but not when applied to humans?
« on: 02/06/2007 10:17:48 »
Some of the people I've spoken to accept the theory of evolution, that organisms change over time and take on new forms as they adapt to their environments. But the same people will outright reject the notion that humans evolved from an ape. They will argue that "why do monkeys and apes still exist? Why haven't they evolved?" These are also people who don't class themselves as animals; humans are above every thing else.

Does anyone have similar experiences?

Logged
Stefan
"No testimony is sufficient to establish a miracle, unless the testimony be of such a kind, that its falsehood would be more miraculous than the fact which it endeavors to establish." -David Hume
 



Offline xerai

  • First timers
  • *
  • 5
  • Activity:
    0%
Evolution is acceptable, but not when applied to humans?
« Reply #1 on: 02/06/2007 13:43:40 »
Saying "we involved from monkeys" is rather inaccurate, really, we are evolved primates. When we started walking upright and using tools and all the other cool things, we didn't magically become another animal. To say that is ignorant of evolution, we are the same animal, but only slightly different.

We are still homo sapiens, and we are only 2-3% different from Gorillas.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.394 seconds with 31 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.