The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. tokomak tritium and deuterium use
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

tokomak tritium and deuterium use

  • 11 Replies
  • 2666 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline trevorjohnson32 (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 492
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 8 times
tokomak tritium and deuterium use
« on: 06/08/2021 21:20:09 »
Just had a brainstorm for the tokamak. What if instead of using super chilled fuel they condense it into a container that is thick enough to provide a sufficient pressure that when it explodes and touches the extreme heat of magnetic confinement it would have a chance at igniting fusion?
Logged
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31102
  • Activity:
    9%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: tokomak tritium and deuterium use
« Reply #1 on: 06/08/2021 21:26:58 »
Any contaminants  (like the disintegrating container) in the plasma increase the losses by thermal radiation and reduce efficiency.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline trevorjohnson32 (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 492
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 8 times
Re: tokomak tritium and deuterium use
« Reply #2 on: 06/08/2021 21:30:30 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 06/08/2021 21:26:58
Any contaminants  (like the disintegrating container) in the plasma increase the losses by thermal radiation and reduce efficiency.

by a lot i bet. So the pressure in the container would have to be substantial you think?
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31102
  • Activity:
    9%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: tokomak tritium and deuterium use
« Reply #3 on: 06/08/2021 21:36:53 »
To get fusion you need a combination of time, pressure and temperature.
If you want it at a useful rate the combination of temperature and pressure is so extreme that nothing will hold it.
You can't make a "container".


If you could, it still wouldn't work
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline trevorjohnson32 (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 492
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 8 times
Re: tokomak tritium and deuterium use
« Reply #4 on: 06/08/2021 21:56:20 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 06/08/2021 21:36:53
To get fusion you need a combination of time, pressure and temperature.
If you want it at a useful rate the combination of temperature and pressure is so extreme that nothing will hold it.
You can't make a "container".


If you could, it still wouldn't work


You wouldn't need the container to be hotter, just make the pellet have enough pressure and small enough so that adds a small amount of heat to the plasma which can be converted.
Logged
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31102
  • Activity:
    9%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: tokomak tritium and deuterium use
« Reply #5 on: 06/08/2021 22:23:25 »
Quote from: trevorjohnson32 on 06/08/2021 21:56:20
You wouldn't need the container to be hotter, just make the pellet have enough pressure and small enough so that adds a small amount of heat to the plasma which can be converted.
Did you read that before you posted it?
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    0.5%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: tokomak tritium and deuterium use
« Reply #6 on: 06/08/2021 23:19:06 »
Quote from: trevorjohnson32 on 06/08/2021 21:20:09
that when it explodes

What's causing it to explode?
Logged
 

Offline trevorjohnson32 (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 492
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 8 times
Re: tokomak tritium and deuterium use
« Reply #7 on: 07/08/2021 01:25:33 »
Quote from: Kryptid on 06/08/2021 23:19:06
Quote from: trevorjohnson32 on 06/08/2021 21:20:09
that when it explodes

What's causing it to explode?

Mixing in oxygen at the core then a layer of tritium and deuterium, encased with a shell.
Logged
 

Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    0.5%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: tokomak tritium and deuterium use
« Reply #8 on: 07/08/2021 01:42:44 »
A chemical explosion from a pellet isn't going to get you anywhere close to the kind of pressures needed for fusion.
Logged
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31102
  • Activity:
    9%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: tokomak tritium and deuterium use
« Reply #9 on: 08/08/2021 15:49:07 »
And, as I pointed out, adding anything else wrecks the efficiency.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline trevorjohnson32 (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 492
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 8 times
Re: tokomak tritium and deuterium use
« Reply #10 on: 08/08/2021 19:32:07 »
So are you suggesting we just pour in super chilled fuel and see what happens? Like it's supposed to slow burn or something?
No, you have to put the fuel in a capsule to keep it together so it has time to fuse right? And I think for every time you double the pressure in the fuel capsule, you're probably lowering the temperature needed to ignite fusion, So mixing hydrogen and oxygen in the pellet.
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31102
  • Activity:
    9%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: tokomak tritium and deuterium use
« Reply #11 on: 08/08/2021 20:03:33 »
This is like trying to light a fire by putting a log under a hen.
They keep eggs warm, so that must be good enough... right?

Chemical reactions  top out at about 5,000K.
Nuclear reactions start at about 50,000,000 K
« Last Edit: 08/08/2021 20:21:29 by Bored chemist »
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 1.677 seconds with 57 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.