0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
So I think I made my point.
ν + e- + e+ + p -> e+ + n + EnergyLS = ud + e+ + uud = udd + e+ + uu
As long as it happens within the time prescribed by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, it's fine.
You could just as easily ask "what information is causing a positron-electron pair to exist from a photon", yet you seem to accept that such a thing can happen just fine.
Says who? I can visualize it just fine.
Human intuition is a poor guide to physics
You can't turn one into the other merely by exchanging the places of quarks.
where did the ud come from?
It is mistaken to allow it for a Heisenberg time
If charge non-conservation was allowed for a Heisenberg time, virtual particles other than virtual particle-antiparticle pairs can start to exist an this is not according to theory, in any case how would they annihilate again?
Space makes electron-positron pairs whenever enough energy is located at a point, while we cannot say space makes a down quark whenever a up quark cease to exist and there is a W+ close by.
The Feynman diagram assumes the W+ is a point particle
it is not and has more than one worldline
It is wrong to deny that Physics behave according to our intuition. It is better to fit it to intuition.
It came from electron-electron anti-neutrino binding.
It is wrong to deny that Physics behave according to our intuition.
It is mistaken to allow it for a Heisenberg timeWhy?
Space makes electron-positron pairs whenever enough energy is located at a point, while we cannot say space makes a down quark whenever a up quark cease to exist and there is a W+ close by.Why?
How can a single object have more than one world line?
Again, intuition is an imperfect guide to how the world actually works.
(1) Those particles don't "bind".
(2) Those particles aren't quarks and don't contain quarks.
They contain sub-quarks.
Because otherwise any virtual particles may come into existence.
Because they would not solely be triggered by energy.
Just because it does not work in that cases does not mean it would fail in all cases.
Why can a ud transform into an electron-electron anti-neutrino then. The inverse process must be allowed (from basic principles of Logic).
Because otherwise any virtual particles may come into existence.They pretty much already do.
Besides, the total number of W+ and W- bosons that make up the weak nuclear field of a particle like an electron or neutrino would be about the same any way.
And how is that a problem?
Sounds like the preon model: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preon
I don't know what you mean by this.
Particles and energy tell space what to do. Where there in no particles only energy can tell space what to do.
So substructure is required for quarks and leptons.