The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Life Sciences
  3. The Environment
  4. What are the best methods for recycling plastics?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

What are the best methods for recycling plastics?

  • 1 Replies
  • 8133 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Paul Anderson

  • Guest
What are the best methods for recycling plastics?
« on: 25/10/2008 12:14:07 »
Paul Anderson  asked the Naked Scientists:

Hi Chris and team,
I haven't listened to all your podcast yet, but in case this subject hasn't been covered yet, how about an item on the best recycling systems in the UK and Europe, including electronic methods of sorting different plastics?
 
Regards
Paul
NZ

What do you think?
Logged
 



Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 81572
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 178 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
  • Best Answer
  • What are the best methods for recycling plastics?
    « Reply #1 on: 12/11/2008 13:27:29 »
    Bury it, preferably rather deep.
    It acts like a 'sink' for CO2.
    And a good one too:)

    It's a little like the best way of deposit nuclear waste

    " One of the most dangerous components of nuclear waste is the radium isotope Ra-226.
    The radioactive isotope Ra-226 is an alpha emitter and has a half-life of approximately T1/2 = 1600 years.
    It has a high solubility and is readily incorporated in biological organisms.
    Because of the high radioactivity and/or the comparatively long half-life of Ra-226 or other components of radioactive waste, parts of the radioactive waste may have to be safely stored for thousands of years."

    Well my view is to place those waste facilities on the surface inside our towns visible to our population.
    with Geiger counters visible too.

    Then we will have some guarantee of them not getting forgotten.
    And getting proper care.

    Humans are not built for thousand year 'reichs' or plans.
    Only ah, how should I put it, credulous people swallows that kind of propaganda.

    So bury plastic deep.
    And put nuclear waste in the cities:)
    « Last Edit: 12/11/2008 13:33:21 by yor_on »
    Logged
    URGENT:  Naked Scientists website is under threat.    https://www.thenakedscientists.com/sos-cambridge-university-killing-dr-chris

    "BOMB DISPOSAL EXPERT. If you see me running, try to keep up."
     



    • Print
    Pages: [1]   Go Up
    « previous next »
    Tags:
     
    There was an error while thanking
    Thanking...
    • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
      Privacy Policy
      SMFAds for Free Forums
    • Naked Science Forum ©

    Page created in 1.446 seconds with 26 queries.

    • Podcasts
    • Articles
    • Get Naked
    • About
    • Contact us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Policy
    • Subscribe to newsletter
    • We love feedback

    Follow us

    cambridge_logo_footer.png

    ©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.