The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Life Sciences
  3. Cells, Microbes & Viruses
  4. Differences betwn prokaryote, eukaryote & endosymbiont antibiotic susceptibility
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Differences betwn prokaryote, eukaryote & endosymbiont antibiotic susceptibility

  • 4 Replies
  • 9593 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline _Stefan_ (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 814
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • My Photobucket Album
Differences betwn prokaryote, eukaryote & endosymbiont antibiotic susceptibility
« on: 07/03/2009 15:30:00 »
Could someone please help me with what the structural and functional differences are between prokaryotes, eukaryotes & endosymbionts, that make them differentially resistant or susceptible to different antibiotics?

Especially the reasons why mitochondria and chloroplasts are resistant to antibiotics that bacteria are susceptible to, even though they have evolved from bacteria themselves?

I am referring to general differences that the groups have, not specific resistances to drugs as in the case of MRSA etc.

Many thanks in advance.
Logged
Stefan
"No testimony is sufficient to establish a miracle, unless the testimony be of such a kind, that its falsehood would be more miraculous than the fact which it endeavors to establish." -David Hume
 



Offline Phil1907

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 71
  • Activity:
    0%
Differences betwn prokaryote, eukaryote & endosymbiont antibiotic susceptibility
« Reply #1 on: 12/03/2009 01:17:29 »
I've not much in the way of reports re. your assumption that mitchondria, for example, are resistant to antibiotics effective vs. bacteria. Certainly those that target cell walls are not relevant.  I do know that chloramphenicol does affect fungal mitchondria as it does bacteria  but it takes higher levels.

Logged
 

Offline _Stefan_ (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 814
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • My Photobucket Album
Differences betwn prokaryote, eukaryote & endosymbiont antibiotic susceptibility
« Reply #2 on: 12/03/2009 03:32:35 »
Thanks.

I assumed mitochondria and chloroplasts are resistant to some bacteria-targeting antibiotics because otherwise they would die whenever we medicate ourselves against bacterial infections. So what's preventing this from happening?
Logged
Stefan
"No testimony is sufficient to establish a miracle, unless the testimony be of such a kind, that its falsehood would be more miraculous than the fact which it endeavors to establish." -David Hume
 

Offline Phil1907

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 71
  • Activity:
    0%
Differences betwn prokaryote, eukaryote & endosymbiont antibiotic susceptibility
« Reply #3 on: 23/03/2009 11:40:50 »
They're not resistant per se - it just takes greater levels.  The chloramphenicol  mitochondrial inhibition requires higher levels - presume due to the physical separation inside the cell).
Of course they'll not be affected cell wall targeting antibiotics like penicillin.
Logged
 

Offline _Stefan_ (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 814
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • My Photobucket Album
Differences betwn prokaryote, eukaryote & endosymbiont antibiotic susceptibility
« Reply #4 on: 24/03/2009 20:55:23 »
Thanks Phil!
Logged
Stefan
"No testimony is sufficient to establish a miracle, unless the testimony be of such a kind, that its falsehood would be more miraculous than the fact which it endeavors to establish." -David Hume
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.258 seconds with 37 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.