The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
Non Life Sciences
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
Why do we assume that extra-terrestrial life requires water or carbon?
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Why do we assume that extra-terrestrial life requires water or carbon?
4 Replies
6955 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Fluid_thinker
(OP)
Full Member
54
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 2 times
Why do we assume that extra-terrestrial life requires water or carbon?
«
on:
11/03/2009 15:56:56 »
Why do we look for Carbon based life and water dependent life?
It seems awfully arrogant that we assume that it is the only form of life that would exist.
«
Last Edit: 12/03/2009 09:43:40 by chris
»
Logged
Vern
Naked Science Forum King!
2072
Activity:
0%
Re: Why do we assume that extra-terrestrial life requires water or carbon?
«
Reply #1 on:
11/03/2009 16:13:44 »
Maybe it is just that carbon-based life is the only life form that we know about. I have seen speculation that silicon might be a candidate.
Logged
Don_1
Naked Science Forum King!
6889
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 15 times
A stupid comment for every occasion.
Re: Why do we assume that extra-terrestrial life requires water or carbon?
«
Reply #2 on:
11/03/2009 16:38:32 »
As Vern has said, it is the only form of life we know of, so it is easier to look for something you stand some chance of being able to identify, rather than something you don't know if you will be able to identify as life.
But you are right, we should try to keep an open mind.
Logged
If brains were made of dynamite, I wouldn't have enough to blow my nose.
Kryptid
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum King!
8082
Activity:
1%
Thanked: 514 times
Re: Why do we assume that extra-terrestrial life requires water or carbon?
«
Reply #3 on:
12/03/2009 08:45:07 »
Polymers with an all-silicon backbone tend to be much more unstable than carbon polymers. Some do exist though, such as polydimethylsilane.
I find it somewhat annoying that silicon-based life is often depicted as being crystalline in appearance. What is that based on? The fact that silicon often takes crystalline form in nature such as quartz? That's hardly a good analogy. Afterall, if we were aliens and we wanted to predict what carbon-based life would look like, would we say that they would be gaseous or liquid because carbon often takes such forms in nature (such as carbon dioxide, methane, and benzene)?
Silicones are much more stable than pure silicon polymers, as they contain oxygen atoms in the backbone. Some are resistant to high temperatures and some are flexible. There are some limitations of silicones relative to carbon polymers. For example, you can have stable double bonds with carbon polymers, but not with silicone backbones. This increases the ability of carbon polymers to form either flexible or rigid structures, whereas silicones are more limited.
Yet other systems besides silicon and silicones might work. Polyphosphazines are composed of phosphorus-nitrogen backbones. These polymers are flexible and make good elastomers.
You might also have a carbon-based life form that uses another solvent to mediate its chemical reactions in place of water. On planets that are cold or have high atmospheric pressure, you might have ammonia, methane, or hydrogen fluoride-drinking aliens. Dimethylsulfoxide might work on temperate worlds.
Logged
lyner
Guest
Why do we assume that extra-terrestrial life requires water or carbon?
«
Reply #4 on:
12/03/2009 10:30:27 »
Do you think an intelligent designer could cope with more than one form of life chemistry?
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...