The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. That CAN'T be true!
  4. Memory span of Goldfish.
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down

Memory span of Goldfish.

  • 42 Replies
  • 66456 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Lana_i_b

  • First timers
  • *
  • 2
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Memory span of Goldfish.
« Reply #40 on: 08/08/2005 05:45:17 »
I'm currently doing a uni assignment on fish memories, and all of the information I have found suggests that they do have very good memories and are capable of learning. A scientist called Ava Chase even taught her carp to distinguish between classical music and the blues!![:0]
newbielink:http://www.abc.net.au/science/k2/moments/s1179348.htm [nonactive] Thats a link to an article which mentions Ava Chase and Culum Browns research, and also talks about fish recognising their owners. I'm convinced. The problem that I have is for my assignment I have to give evidence for both sodes of the argument and, unbelievable as it may seem, I cannot find a single scientist or piece of scientific writing that mentions fish having a short memory. The 3-second thing is a myth... but where did it come from?!?! All I can find is loads of evidence pointing in the other direction.
[?]Does anyone know of any books or internet sites or articles that argue that fish have a 3 second memory? [?]
Logged
 
 



Offline jenharris85

  • First timers
  • *
  • 1
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Memory span of Goldfish.
« Reply #41 on: 01/01/2006 14:20:35 »
Maybe you're just an idiot (Tabatha), ever consider that? All topics have a purpose, a curiousity, without someone's interest, you'd never have anything you surround yourself with daily. Technology is amazing, but it is all a creation of the human mind- learn to appreciate. That goldfish may have nothing to do with anything you ever do in life, but then again, someone could strike a discovery that saves your life one day. Besides, if you're not interested, why are you responding?

quote:
Originally posted by TabathaJo

The real question should be, who actually takes the time to test a fish's memory span -- this is one of the silliest topics I've ever heard.

Tabatha

Logged
 
 

Offline Andrew K Fletcher

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2333
  • Activity:
    0%
  • KIS Keep It Simple
Re: Memory span of Goldfish.
« Reply #42 on: 01/01/2006 14:33:47 »
blooobbble bloooble glug blooble, anyone seen my tank? blooble blooooble glug
Logged
Science is continually evolving. Nothing is set in stone. Question everything and everyone. Always consider vested interests as a reason for miss-direction. But most of all explore and find answers that you are comfortable with
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.752 seconds with 30 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.