The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Relativistic orbits under gravity
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Relativistic orbits under gravity

  • 5 Replies
  • 5471 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Soul Surfer (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3389
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 8 times
  • keep banging the rocks together
    • ian kimber's web workspace
Relativistic orbits under gravity
« on: 26/11/2005 19:15:17 »
I have been trying to find good references to this on the web but so far have not been very successful (although it has led me to this interesting forum).  However a quick scan suggests that there are not many real experts around here only lots of interested parties with interesting ideas.

The real question is that when one body is orbiting another body under grvitational attraction at speeds significant with respect to the velocity of light what is the value of the mass of the body you should use in the calculation of the orbital parameters is it the rest mass of the body or the rest mass plus the extra mass associated with the velocity of the body, because as a body increses its velocity towards the speed of liht it gets more difficult to accelerate it further and this can be interpreded as an increase in its effective inertial mass

Also what do relativistic orbits look like. I know that a tiny relatavistic effect is suppose to cause a rotation of the perihelion of the planet mercury but what happens when elliptical orbets get more extreme

Learn, create, test and tell
evolution rules in all things
Logged
Learn, create, test and tell
evolution rules in all things
God says so!
 



Offline ukmicky

  • Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • *****
  • 3065
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 7 times
    • http://www.space-talk.com/
Re: Relativistic orbits under gravity
« Reply #1 on: 26/11/2005 19:59:14 »
Hi Ian

I agree this is a interesting forum.
Sadly I’m just one of them interested parties [:(] but we do have a few members with the necessary academic background who could help you. Hopefully they will get back to you[:)]


Michael                                      
« Last Edit: 26/11/2005 19:59:58 by ukmicky »
Logged
 

Offline neilep

  • Withdrawnmist
  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21211
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 119 times
Re: Relativistic orbits under gravity
« Reply #2 on: 26/11/2005 20:20:51 »
Where's Gsmollin and Solvay when we need them ?...probably enjoying a life rather than being sad like me and being here on a Saturday evening !!!

Men are the same as women.... just inside out !!
Logged
Men are the same as Women, just inside out !
 

Dr. Praetoria

  • Guest
Re: Relativistic orbits under gravity
« Reply #3 on: 26/11/2005 22:02:16 »
You could check out this web page--

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/ParticleAndNuclear/photon_mass.html

Hope it helps.
Doc
Logged
 

Offline Soul Surfer (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3389
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 8 times
  • keep banging the rocks together
    • ian kimber's web workspace
Re: Relativistic orbits under gravity
« Reply #4 on: 26/11/2005 23:31:30 »
Thank you that reference is helpful and reminds me of the equations but as far as I can see does not answer my question directly but with a bit of analysis may offer an answer. So far with a quick skim though it and some of its related documents I have seen a possible  answer in both directions and also one that says it might even be somewhere in between  :-)  I think I'd better sleep on it.



Learn, create, test and tell
evolution rules in all things
Logged
Learn, create, test and tell
evolution rules in all things
God says so!
 



Offline Solvay_1927

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 383
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Relativistic orbits under gravity
« Reply #5 on: 28/11/2005 14:56:21 »
quote:
Where's Gsmollin and Solvay when we need them ?...

Whaddaya mean, "and Solvay"?! I'm not in the same league as gsmollin &co, I'm just an amateur beginner!  (Neil, don't tell me that I've even managed to fool you with my bluffing and pretending to sound authoritative! [:)])

Anyway, I don't know the answer to this question.  But it's a good one, Ian.  Let us know if you get an answer.
Logged
 
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.295 seconds with 41 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.