The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Is this youtube videeo scientifically correct?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Is this youtube videeo scientifically correct?

  • 4 Replies
  • 5377 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jartza (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 230
  • Activity:
    0%
Is this youtube videeo scientifically correct?
« on: 12/03/2011 11:31:04 »
Speeds that the rods reach are relativistic

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oqa3HYkg5no

Logged
 



Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 81572
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 178 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
Is this youtube videeo scientifically correct?
« Reply #1 on: 12/03/2011 17:14:48 »
If you rotate the rod too close to 'c' it will crack, the question seems to become which one it will be, your first rod, or the second one? And that seems to have to do with what speeds the first rod reach before the second one start to rotate, and also how the second rod is situated relative the motion, before it too starts to rotate?

You really like the difficult ones, don't you Jartza :)
Logged
URGENT:  Naked Scientists website is under threat.    https://www.thenakedscientists.com/sos-cambridge-university-killing-dr-chris

"BOMB DISPOSAL EXPERT. If you see me running, try to keep up."
 

Offline Soul Surfer

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3389
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 8 times
  • keep banging the rocks together
    • ian kimber's web workspace
Is this youtube videeo scientifically correct?
« Reply #2 on: 13/03/2011 11:37:45 »
Why should you say that jartza? your video has no explanations, dimensions materials, or statements of rotational velocity.

No part of a machine like that made from ANY material could remotely reach a relativistic velocity provided you defined relativistic velocity as a significant  fraction say 10% of the velocity of light.

However it is obvious that all velocities ARE relativistic if you place no lower limit it is just that any departure from non relativistic behaviour would be extremely small and almost ubdetectable
Logged
Learn, create, test and tell
evolution rules in all things
God says so!
 

Offline syhprum

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 5198
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 74 times
Is this youtube videeo scientifically correct?
« Reply #3 on: 13/03/2011 11:41:34 »
The power rating of an electric motor bears no direct relation to its rotational speed this is mostly determined by it's detailed design
Logged
 

Offline Phractality

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 523
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
Is this youtube videeo scientifically correct?
« Reply #4 on: 16/03/2011 13:52:33 »
I agree with Soul Surfer  [8D] completely, except it's more like .00001% instead of 10%. A flywheel in the form of a uniform steel disk has a maximum rim speed in the neighborhood of 300 to 500 m/s. (Any mechanical engineer can tell you, the size of the flywheel doesn't matter, the rim speed is the same for any shape and material.) Max rim speed for a flywheel made of carbon nanotubes with the theoretical maximum strength might be in the neighborhood of 1 km/s. To be generous, you might guess that the max rim speed is the speed of sound in the material, which is about 8,000 m/s for Kevlar. The speed of light is 300,000,000 m/s.  [:o]

So your motors can't be made of atoms. Maybe they're atomic scale motors, and the armatures are electrons. Still, you're on shaky ground assuming that relativity works at that scale. GR doesn't work at the quantum scale. In my own model, the Higgs force alters the path of light zillions of times more strongly than gravity does. Anything that bends light in Euclidean space causes the warp of Minkowski space time. So GR needs to be modified to include the warp due to the Higgs force if it is to work at the atomic scale.
Logged
Imagination is more important than knowledge. Einstein
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.366 seconds with 39 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.