The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
Non Life Sciences
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
Is this youtube videeo scientifically correct?
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Is this youtube videeo scientifically correct?
4 Replies
5379 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
jartza
(OP)
Sr. Member
230
Activity:
0%
Is this youtube videeo scientifically correct?
«
on:
12/03/2011 11:31:04 »
Speeds that the rods reach are relativistic
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oqa3HYkg5no
Logged
yor_on
Naked Science Forum GOD!
81572
Activity:
100%
Thanked: 178 times
(Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
Is this youtube videeo scientifically correct?
«
Reply #1 on:
12/03/2011 17:14:48 »
If you rotate the rod too close to 'c' it will crack, the question seems to become which one it will be, your first rod, or the second one? And that seems to have to do with what speeds the first rod reach before the second one start to rotate, and also how the second rod is situated relative the motion, before it too starts to rotate?
You really like the difficult ones, don't you Jartza
Logged
URGENT: Naked Scientists website is under threat.
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/sos-cambridge-university-killing-dr-chris
"BOMB DISPOSAL EXPERT. If you see me running, try to keep up."
Soul Surfer
Naked Science Forum King!
3389
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 8 times
keep banging the rocks together
Is this youtube videeo scientifically correct?
«
Reply #2 on:
13/03/2011 11:37:45 »
Why should you say that jartza? your video has no explanations, dimensions materials, or statements of rotational velocity.
No part of a machine like that made from ANY material could remotely reach a relativistic velocity provided you defined relativistic velocity as a significant fraction say 10% of the velocity of light.
However it is obvious that all velocities ARE relativistic if you place no lower limit it is just that any departure from non relativistic behaviour would be extremely small and almost ubdetectable
Logged
Learn, create, test and tell
evolution rules in all things
God says so!
syhprum
Naked Science Forum King!
5198
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 74 times
Is this youtube videeo scientifically correct?
«
Reply #3 on:
13/03/2011 11:41:34 »
The power rating of an electric motor bears no direct relation to its rotational speed this is mostly determined by it's detailed design
Logged
Phractality
Hero Member
523
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 1 times
Is this youtube videeo scientifically correct?
«
Reply #4 on:
16/03/2011 13:52:33 »
I agree with Soul Surfer [8D] completely, except it's more like .00001% instead of 10%. A flywheel in the form of a uniform steel disk has a maximum rim speed in the neighborhood of 300 to 500 m/s. (Any mechanical engineer can tell you, the size of the flywheel doesn't matter, the rim speed is the same for any shape and material.) Max rim speed for a flywheel made of carbon nanotubes with the theoretical maximum strength might be in the neighborhood of 1 km/s. To be generous, you might guess that the max rim speed is the speed of sound in the material, which is about 8,000 m/s for Kevlar. The speed of light is 300,000,000 m/s. [
]
So your motors can't be made of atoms. Maybe they're atomic scale motors, and the armatures are electrons. Still, you're on shaky ground assuming that relativity works at that scale. GR doesn't work at the quantum scale. In
my own model
, the Higgs force alters the path of light zillions of times more strongly than gravity does. Anything that bends light in Euclidean space causes the warp of Minkowski space time. So GR needs to be modified to include the warp due to the Higgs force if it is to work at the atomic scale.
Logged
Imagination is more important than knowledge. Einstein
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...