The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Can light "saturate" space?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Can light "saturate" space?

  • 12 Replies
  • 6799 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Geezer (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 8314
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 8 times
  • "Vive la résistance!"
Can light "saturate" space?
« on: 27/05/2011 06:22:03 »
Goolag's "light-in-the-box" question provoked this question, but I thought it might be worthy of its own thread.

How much electromagnetic radiation (light, radio, etc.) can pass through a volume of space? Is there some theoretical limit at which spacetime "saturates" (for want of a better word), or is there no known limit?
Logged
There ain'ta no sanity clause, and there ain'ta no centrifugal force æther.
 



Offline CliffordK

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 6596
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 61 times
  • Site Moderator
Can light "saturate" space?
« Reply #1 on: 27/05/2011 06:32:41 »
Through space, I don't believe there is a limit.  The question might be whether a photon actually has both mass and volume, at which point there would be a theoretical limit in which all space is filled with photons.

In an atmosphere such as Earth's atmosphere, there is a limit of sorts.  Strong lasers tend to ionize the atmosphere and diffuse which is one of the reasons why energy beam weapons aren't very effective on Earth.
Logged
 

Offline JP

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3346
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 3 times
Can light "saturate" space?
« Reply #2 on: 27/05/2011 06:39:25 »
Quote from: Geezer on 27/05/2011 06:22:03
Goolag's "light-in-the-box" question provoked this question, but I thought it might be worthy of its own thread.

How much electromagnetic radiation (light, radio, etc.) can pass through a volume of space? Is there some theoretical limit at which spacetime "saturates" (for want of a better word), or is there no known limit?

There are a couple of interesting things that should happen.  At some point, you begin to deviate from Maxwell's equations since light can interact with itself through weird quantum processes.  From what I understand, this happens at very high energy densities.  If you Google for phrases like "nonlinear light interaction in vacuum" you'll find a bunch of papers.  Just one example is here: http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PR/v129/i5/p2354_1

As for a more fundamental limit, there is certainly a limit at which our current theories break down.  I don't know exactly where that is, but it probably relates to the Planck density.  At that point, we don't know how to accurately predict the effects, which would involve quantum effects due to gravity interacting with the light.  

What I don't know is if you could somehow concentrate the light enough so that you form a black hole.  It's easy to think about stuffing enough mass into an area to form a black hole, since mass will play nicely and sit still until you get enough of it together.  Light has the unhappy tendency to go flying off at light speed as soon as you turn your back, so getting all your photons in the same place at the same time is going to be difficult.
Logged
 

Offline CliffordK

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 6596
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 61 times
  • Site Moderator
Can light "saturate" space?
« Reply #3 on: 27/05/2011 07:56:30 »
Ok, Geezer.

I have a science experiment for you.

Head off to the star: R136a1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R136a1

Build a mirrored Dyson's sphere around it with the goal of focusing 8,700,000 "suns" into a single point.

Unfortunately, at 165,000 lightyears away, it will be a long trip to get there, and since the larger the star the quicker they die, unfortunately the star might go into supernova (hypernova) before we could ever even reach it.  Even so, if you could capture 100% of the light from the hypernova, all the better!!!
Logged
 

Offline CZARCAR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 686
  • Activity:
    0%
Can light "saturate" space?
« Reply #4 on: 27/05/2011 16:26:03 »
assuming space is a vaccumn & the massless waves are saturated, I think u may have defined the LIFE FORCE?
Logged
 



Offline Phractality

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 523
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
Can light "saturate" space?
« Reply #5 on: 27/05/2011 19:25:33 »
Contrary to mainstream science, I believe light propagates in the manner of an acoustic shear wave in an ultra-dense, ultra-stiff, ultra-strong aether. I believe the aether's density, stiffness and strength are finite, but far greater than any stress that we can impose on it experimentally. Even the most intense aether waves probably only wiggle the aether by a small fraction of a Planck length. However, given infinite space and time, it seems inevitable that shear waves from many directions will occasionally coincide at a point long enough to tear the fabric of the aether. When this happens, it might contribute to the expansion of space.

A logical connection between expansion of space and tearing the fabric of the aether can be inferred from my model in the New Theroies section.
Logged
Imagination is more important than knowledge. Einstein
 

Offline lightarrow

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 4605
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 16 times
Can light "saturate" space?
« Reply #6 on: 28/05/2011 02:44:10 »
Quote from: Geezer on 27/05/2011 06:22:03
Goolag's "light-in-the-box" question provoked this question, but I thought it might be worthy of its own thread.

How much electromagnetic radiation (light, radio, etc.) can pass through a volume of space? Is there some theoretical limit at which spacetime "saturates" (for want of a better word), or is there no known limit?
If the energy density is high enough, spacetime is warped so much that nothing can escape anymore (black hole). I leave the computations to you ...
« Last Edit: 28/05/2011 02:45:47 by lightarrow »
Logged
 

Offline imatfaal

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2782
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • rouge moderator
Can light "saturate" space?
« Reply #7 on: 28/05/2011 10:05:53 »
LightArrow - take a look at my rough attempt in the Light in a Box Thread

http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=39533.msg357146#msg357146

Seems too obvious and I am sure I have committed a huge howler
Logged
There’s no sense in being precise when you don’t even know what you’re talking about.  John Von Neumann

At the surface, we may appear as intellects, helpful people, friendly staff or protectors of the interwebs. Deep down inside, we're all trolls. CaptainPanic @ sf.n
 

Offline lightarrow

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 4605
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 16 times
Can light "saturate" space?
« Reply #8 on: 28/05/2011 19:45:35 »
Quote from: imatfaal on 28/05/2011 10:05:53
LightArrow - take a look at my rough attempt in the Light in a Box Thread

http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=39533.msg357146#msg357146

Seems too obvious and I am sure I have committed a huge howler
For what I know, it's correct.
The secret in physics is to understand the basic concepts. Then you can do some computations. If they are approximate, it doesn't matter, you have time to refine them...
Logged
 



Offline goolag

  • First timers
  • *
  • 4
  • Activity:
    0%
Can light "saturate" space?
« Reply #9 on: 29/05/2011 16:12:54 »
Excellent answers, giving me lots to think about!

I think I've invented a new interstellar bomb by the sounds of it - if ever we go to war with a nearby solar system we could fire these boxes off at the star - with the correct timings, the boxes would arrive at the target, having absorbed enough light to collapse in black holes with devasting effect.

I'm sure there'd be a more peaceful application though...



Logged
 

Offline Ken Hughes

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 56
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
Can light "saturate" space?
« Reply #10 on: 29/05/2011 17:12:31 »
Ebergy = mass and so will dilate time just the same. If you put enough energy into a finite space, then that space will turn black. It will form a black hole.
The practicalities of this are debatable, since one would have to crush the Earth to the size of a grape to make it go black and that is with mass itself which is must more dense than radiation.
Other than that, I don't see any fundamental limit to the energy density applied.
Logged
 

Offline lightarrow

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 4605
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 16 times
Can light "saturate" space?
« Reply #11 on: 29/05/2011 17:16:48 »
Quote from: goolag on 29/05/2011 16:12:54
I think I've invented a new interstellar bomb by the sounds of it - if ever we go to war with a nearby solar system we could fire these boxes off at the star - with the correct timings, the boxes would arrive at the target, having absorbed enough light to collapse in black holes with devasting effect.
If you have the possibility to do that, you surely can create a supernova as well...
Logged
 

Offline Geezer (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 8314
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 8 times
  • "Vive la résistance!"
Can light "saturate" space?
« Reply #12 on: 29/05/2011 17:58:36 »
How close do fusion reactors come to hitting the limits?
Logged
There ain'ta no sanity clause, and there ain'ta no centrifugal force æther.
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.66 seconds with 61 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.