The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Planets formation theory
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Planets formation theory

  • 5 Replies
  • 7585 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Zichichi (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 29
  • Activity:
    0%
Planets formation theory
« on: 08/07/2006 10:19:49 »
This is a my theory!.......

I think superficial explosions on the sun at its equator can
make the planets if this material goes out of the sun orbit...
This material also can have a charge..that can be the reason of the
magnetic field of the planets...












nothing is created and nothing is destroyed
Logged
nothing is created and nothing is destroyed
 



Offline ukmicky

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3065
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 7 times
    • http://www.space-talk.com/
Re: Planets formation theory
« Reply #1 on: 08/07/2006 14:21:51 »
No

Michael
Logged
 

Offline Zichichi (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 29
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Planets formation theory
« Reply #2 on: 09/07/2006 09:37:09 »
What, no?
Why?
Have you written a book about another theory?

The science has  become subjective..., what a pain!...


nothing is created and nothing is destroyed
Logged
nothing is created and nothing is destroyed
 

Offline daveshorts

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2568
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Physics, Experiments
    • http://www.chaosscience.org.uk
Re: Planets formation theory
« Reply #3 on: 09/07/2006 11:41:10 »
There are many reasons why this wouldn't work

1. The stuff that makes up the sun is very different from the stuff that makes up the planets.

2. There is a whole lot more angular momentum in a planet than in stuff at the surface of the sun.

3. Objects don't need to be charged to have a magnetic field, they need flowing electric currents, or aligned spins
...

But the real killer is that if you throw something from the sun the orbit it will follow will come back through the sun, so any planets you make will collide with the sun one orbit later.
Logged
 

another_someone

  • Guest
Re: Planets formation theory
« Reply #4 on: 09/07/2006 12:27:03 »
Not only are the planets not made of the same stuff as the Sun's surface, but they are not even made of the same stuff as each other.

Furthermore, the Sun does continuously blast material from its surface, and this is what creates the solar wind, that travels out well beyond the orbit of the planets.  If there was an extraordinary explosion on the surface of the Sun (as sometimes happens with solar flares), then the material from this too would be carried out well beyond the reach of the planetary orbits.



George
Logged
 



Offline heikki

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 56
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Planets formation theory
« Reply #5 on: 15/07/2006 14:40:21 »
quote:
Originally posted by Zichichi

This is a my theory!.......

I think superficial explosions on the sun at its equator can
make the planets if this material goes out of the sun orbit...
This material also can have a charge..that can be the reason of the
magnetic field of the planets...




[:)]

Hi.

Material can maybe goes through sun. Because sun send material it must get material also same time. But there is other possibility. Sun start to grow few material-particle sizes, long long ago. Growing and growing, then it grows very big planet. Then it slowly start that todays boiling-process and time this process sun send material to space, then material amount decreacing.  When this process start to end, sun decreacing that boiling-process and sun-light decreacing and after that sun-planet is only rock-ball and dont send any material to space.

Do we actually know what is sun-surface temperature?

What is sun space-nature-based life-cyccle-time, so called planet-life-evolution time, i thinkt that it is un-possible to measure. We can make only estimation calculation of that. Estimation calculation need still some kind of life-cyccle-growing-process method. What is age of earth? Do earth intake material from space and how much / 1000 year. What is earth diameter growing speed / 1000year? Is earth-ball now get maximun diameter or do it growing more? And that kind of stuff.

But, what is purpose of this planet-evolution process?

Why space-material want to make planets from itselfs?

How life works?
 
We humans can made questions where is no answer. I think that many scientifical and philosophical humans made these same questions at 100year forward, without answer.

Like we know. All big philosopher or scientist wrote some short thoughts, like they says. And many generation copy these words to forward.

So i wrote my own very deep-minted thought. ;)

"I have wondering many times how moon can smile."


[:)]
Logged
 
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.383 seconds with 45 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.