The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Technology
  4. What are the chances of sending a probe to the nearest star
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

What are the chances of sending a probe to the nearest star

  • 1 Replies
  • 2528 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline syhprum (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 5198
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 74 times
What are the chances of sending a probe to the nearest star
« on: 17/01/2017 19:03:06 »
I would be interesting to send a probe to the Centauri system but I see several problems, firstly the speed must be at least .05c and the only means I know of to produce such a high speed is with a Photon beam but that requires 500MW  per Newton so the acceleration would be extremely low.
The next problem would be interstellar particles with which it would collide even at the modest speed of ISS these pose a problem which is tiny compared with what Centauri 1 would face.
please detail your designs.
Logged
 



Offline Atomic-S

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 981
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 19 times
Re: What are the chances of sending a probe to the nearest star
« Reply #1 on: 21/01/2017 05:23:08 »
Would an advanced ion rocket do the job? Not saying it would be easy. The charged particles would  have to be accelerated through a very much greater potential difference than current technology uses, which requires the hardware to do that, which might be so bulky as to negate the thrust. Or, the charge could be accelerated via something like a cyclotron, also very bulky.  Or, the power could come via photovoltaic panels energized by lasers mounted on Earth or elsewhere in the Solar System, creating a large potential difference between two widely spaced electrodes, which would be much less bulky. Note that this scheme does not rely solely upon the laser light to provide the momentum to the ship.
Logged
 
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.305 seconds with 32 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.