The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Can thermo-electric force be represented as a component of radiation?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Can thermo-electric force be represented as a component of radiation?

  • 3 Replies
  • 2700 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Richard777 (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 191
  • Activity:
    0%
Can thermo-electric force be represented as a component of radiation?
« on: 23/10/2017 15:53:00 »
The Bohr atom assumes reciprocal forces act upon a bound electron;

“The centripetal force is reciprocal to the electro-static force.”

Assume a modification to the Bohr assumption;

“The magnitude of the centripetal force is equal to the magnitude of the thermo-electric force.”

This assumption combines forces related to heat, electric charge, and momentum. The forces are components of a force vector, the “emissive vector”. Quantization and mass dilation are included in the components.
The emissive vector has three states; a steady state (bound state), a radiant state, and a general state.
If the electric force is equal to zero, the electron is free (unbound).
If various conditions apply, then the orbital radius or black body radiation are easily obtained.
Can heat be included in the Bohr equation?
* Reference.pdf (158.07 kB - downloaded 160 times.)
Logged
 



Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    1%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: Can thermo-electric force be represented as a component of radiation?
« Reply #1 on: 23/10/2017 16:52:26 »
The Bohr model isn't as accurate as quantum mechanics is when it comes to explaining the behavior of atoms. It's also a little tricky to apply temperature to individual subatomic particles. I have seen temperature equated to the kinetic energy (often measured in electronvolts) of subatomic particles, although classically temperature is usually considered an emergent property of bulk systems containing many particles.
Logged
 

Offline jeffreyH

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6996
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 192 times
  • The graviton sucks
Re: Can thermo-electric force be represented as a component of radiation?
« Reply #2 on: 23/10/2017 17:03:38 »
It is heat rather than temperature that is considered for inclusion by the poster.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/heat.html
« Last Edit: 23/10/2017 17:08:33 by jeffreyH »
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 

Offline PmbPhy

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3902
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 126 times
Re: Can thermo-electric force be represented as a component of radiation?
« Reply #3 on: 28/10/2017 07:07:26 »
The answer to your question Can thermo-electric force be represented as a component of radiation? is no. Radiation (at least the kind you're referring to) is an Electromagnetic wave consisting of an electric field and a magnetic field - period. Nothing else. A force is different than a field. A field doesn't require body to exist whereas a force does. By this I mean that the EM force only exists when there is a charged particle which when placed in an EM field then exist. No charged body to act on -> no force.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.525 seconds with 36 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.