The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. A new theory about new theories
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

A new theory about new theories

  • 26 Replies
  • 5387 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: A new theory about new theories
« Reply #20 on: 31/03/2019 15:59:42 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 31/03/2019 15:55:22
Quote from: Thebox on 31/03/2019 15:51:31
Quote from: Bored chemist on 31/03/2019 15:48:15
Quote from: Thebox on 31/03/2019 15:35:23
You can't be a crank for posting a new theory in a new theory section
I will let others judge that.
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=76599.0

Quite obviously it was meant to be a sarcastic theory in regards to the way my real theories are discussed and the seriousness they are discussed .

See poll .
Given your history it is far from obvious that it was ironic.

I don't know about ironic , I do know that science doesn't want to discuss advancing science .  If only you listened a bit more and actually discussed , we might actually get somewhere .
My equation works for almost everything Mr C , it's great , I love maths now .

Logged
 



Offline Yahya A.Sharif (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 511
  • Activity:
    11%
  • Thanked: 4 times
Re: A new theory about new theories
« Reply #21 on: 31/03/2019 16:02:16 »
Quote from: Thebox on 31/03/2019 15:59:42
My equation works for almost everything Mr C , it's great , I love maths now .
It's strange that you call me Mr C and I'm the only one who puts his name.Just kidding
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: A new theory about new theories
« Reply #22 on: 31/03/2019 16:04:25 »
Quote from: Yahya Sharif on 31/03/2019 16:02:16
Quote from: Thebox on 31/03/2019 15:59:42
My equation works for almost everything Mr C , it's great , I love maths now .
It's strange that you call me Mr C and I'm the only one who puts his name.Just kidding
I really don't think he meant you.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: A new theory about new theories
« Reply #23 on: 31/03/2019 16:04:57 »
Quote from: Thebox on 31/03/2019 15:59:42
My equation works for almost everything Mr C ,
No, it doesn't.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: A new theory about new theories
« Reply #24 on: 31/03/2019 16:06:28 »
Quote from: Yahya Sharif on 31/03/2019 16:02:16
Quote from: Thebox on 31/03/2019 15:59:42
My equation works for almost everything Mr C , it's great , I love maths now .
It's strange that you call me Mr C and I'm the only one who puts his name.Just kidding
You'd be Mr Y ..
Logged
 



guest39538

  • Guest
Re: A new theory about new theories
« Reply #25 on: 31/03/2019 16:07:27 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 31/03/2019 16:04:57
Quote from: Thebox on 31/03/2019 15:59:42
My equation works for almost everything Mr C ,
No, it doesn't.

Yes it does . Go over to 5d thread . I show you
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: A new theory about new theories
« Reply #26 on: 31/03/2019 16:23:30 »
Quote from: Thebox on 31/03/2019 16:07:27
Quote from: Bored chemist on 31/03/2019 16:04:57
Quote from: Thebox on 31/03/2019 15:59:42
My equation works for almost everything Mr C ,
No, it doesn't.

Yes it does . Go over to 5d thread . I show you
That's one of many threads where you refused to address problems with what you said.
It does not make sense.

So sending people there to try to understand something is pointless.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 1.478 seconds with 38 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.