A new theory about new theories

Yahya A.Sharif · « **on:** 30/03/2019 17:05:23 »

All theories here are invalid except mine:
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=76559.0

Yahya A.Sharif · « **Reply #1 on:** 30/03/2019 17:23:41 »

My other new theories are also invalid.

Kryptid · « **Reply #2 on:** 30/03/2019 20:08:58 »

Can you elaborate?

Yahya A.Sharif · « **Reply #3 on:** 31/03/2019 06:05:53 »

Quote from: Kryptid on 30/03/2019 20:08:58

Can you elaborate?

The non-sense here compared to my logic.A new theory is difficult one has to have deep thinking . No theory here is supported with logic .

Bored chemist · « **Reply #4 on:** 31/03/2019 09:33:36 »

Quote from: Yahya Sharif on 30/03/2019 17:05:23

All theories here are invalid except mine:

You have not provided any evidence that you have a "theory".
You have some poorly framed ideas.
A theory is much more than that.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory

Kryptid · « **Reply #5 on:** 31/03/2019 15:01:51 »

Quote from: Yahya Sharif on 31/03/2019 06:05:53

No theory here is supported with logic .

And what makes you say that?

guest39538 · « **Reply #6 on:** 31/03/2019 15:03:45 »

Quote from: Yahya Sharif on 30/03/2019 17:05:23

All theories here are invalid except mine:
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=76559.0

Actually , all theories here or anywhere else are invalid except mine . My theory is absolute .

Yahya A.Sharif · « **Reply #7 on:** 31/03/2019 15:14:07 »

Quote from: Kryptid on 31/03/2019 15:01:51

Quote from: Yahya Sharif on 31/03/2019 06:05:53
No theory here is supported with logic .

And what makes you say that?

It's obvious.

Kryptid · « **Reply #8 on:** 31/03/2019 15:15:46 »

Quote from: Yahya Sharif on 31/03/2019 15:14:07

It's obvious.

I'm afraid it isn't.

guest39538 · « **Reply #9 on:** 31/03/2019 15:19:26 »

Quote from: Yahya Sharif on 31/03/2019 15:14:07

Quote from: Kryptid on 31/03/2019 15:01:51
Quote from: Yahya Sharif on 31/03/2019 06:05:53
No theory here is supported with logic .

And what makes you say that?
It's obvious.

You must be speaking about your own work

Because my work is superb .

$bbf92a1e0a4f46a229a668e9b47bd5f2.gif$

Covers just about everything …..

Yahya A.Sharif · « **Reply #10 on:** 31/03/2019 15:25:24 »

Quote from: Thebox on 31/03/2019 15:19:26

Quote from: Yahya Sharif on 31/03/2019 15:14:07
Quote from: Kryptid on 31/03/2019 15:01:51
Quote from: Yahya Sharif on 31/03/2019 06:05:53
No theory here is supported with logic .

And what makes you say that?
It's obvious.

You must be speaking about your own work

Because my work is superb .

$bbf92a1e0a4f46a229a668e9b47bd5f2.gif$

Covers just about everything …..

https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=76600.0

Kryptid · « **Reply #11 on:** 31/03/2019 15:30:44 »

In all seriousness, I have no idea what your thread about infinity has to do with anyone else's theories.

Bored chemist · « **Reply #12 on:** 31/03/2019 15:33:06 »

And this is why I say the site needs a mechanism to clamp down on cranks.

guest39538 · « **Reply #13 on:** 31/03/2019 15:35:23 »

Quote from: Bored chemist on 31/03/2019 15:33:06

And this is why I say the site needs a mechanism to clamp down on cranks.

You can't be a crank for posting a new theory in a new theory section Mr Chemist , you of all people should know the differences in the word new and the word existing theory .

Yahya A.Sharif · « **Reply #14 on:** 31/03/2019 15:44:07 »

Quote from: Kryptid on 31/03/2019 15:30:44

In all seriousness, I have no idea what your thread about infinity has to do with anyone else's theories.

It's just my opinion and not on a personal way.It's all about what we write here what we discuss .I'm not against the forum rules.

Yahya A.Sharif · « **Reply #15 on:** 31/03/2019 15:46:43 »

Quote from: Kryptid on 31/03/2019 15:30:44

In all seriousness, I have no idea what your thread about infinity has to do with anyone else's theories.

The discussion is great but the theories are invalid.

Bored chemist · « **Reply #16 on:** 31/03/2019 15:48:15 »

Quote from: Thebox on 31/03/2019 15:35:23

You can't be a crank for posting a new theory in a new theory section

I will let others judge that.
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=76599.0

Bored chemist · « **Reply #17 on:** 31/03/2019 15:48:55 »

Quote from: Yahya Sharif on 31/03/2019 15:46:43

The discussion is great but the theories are invalid.

You keep saying that, but not providing evidence.

guest39538 · « **Reply #18 on:** 31/03/2019 15:51:31 »

Quote from: Bored chemist on 31/03/2019 15:48:15

Quote from: Thebox on 31/03/2019 15:35:23
You can't be a crank for posting a new theory in a new theory section
I will let others judge that.
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=76599.0

Quite obviously it was meant to be a sarcastic theory in regards to the way my real theories are discussed and the seriousness they are discussed .

See poll .

Bored chemist · « **Reply #19 on:** 31/03/2019 15:55:22 »

Quote from: Thebox on 31/03/2019 15:51:31

Quote from: Bored chemist on 31/03/2019 15:48:15
Quote from: Thebox on 31/03/2019 15:35:23
You can't be a crank for posting a new theory in a new theory section
I will let others judge that.
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=76599.0

Quite obviously it was meant to be a sarcastic theory in regards to the way my real theories are discussed and the seriousness they are discussed .

See poll .

Given your history it is far from obvious that it was ironic.
How about "I propose that presently 1 second is equal to a distance, a value of 1 second is equal to 0.2875 miles per second of the Earth's rotation."
Was that a joke?
Or "Yes here we go again, and yes I am saying to all of you who are presently witnessing day time and light, that it is actually absolute darkness."
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=59228.msg463267#msg463267
Was that meant to be funny?

A new theory about new theories

Yahya A.Sharif (OP)

Yahya A.Sharif (OP)

Yahya A.Sharif (OP)

guest39538

Yahya A.Sharif (OP)

guest39538

Yahya A.Sharif (OP)

guest39538

Yahya A.Sharif (OP)

Yahya A.Sharif (OP)

guest39538