The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. The Universe Inside and Out .
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

The Universe Inside and Out .

  • 26 Replies
  • 7219 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: The Universe Inside and Out .
« Reply #20 on: 08/04/2019 16:50:00 »
Page 12

Formation of the 7 dimensional interwoven manifold .


In the previous section , we discussed Micro Bangs and the temporal transition of point charge ,  in which was proposed , that a mono-pole point charge manifestation has no mechanism to form an existence when surrounded by an unspecified volume of real coordinate space  that has a lesser density and lesser magnitude of energy  . Thus leading us now to consider the aspects of how a point charge could posibly retain form and density to become  stable  remaining in existence .

The Universe Inside and Out , now considers bonding  and what binary construct and/or process would be physically required to form a stable bond of energies namely micro bang energy ,  in a real coordinate space. A binary is something that is based of two parts , in consideration of this I ask you to preliminary accept  the prior  Q1 and Q2 in being the two individual parts , that will construct the first stable binary of energies forming  the 7 dimensional interwoven manifold .

We'll now consider any random point of real coordinate space and  consider a simultaneous event of Q1 and Q2 manifesting at this given point , simultaneously occupying the given point .  We already know by our present founded laws of physics and Coulombs law of charge that opposite charges attract .   Q1 and Q2 are attracted to each other by natural conditional laws .
The Universe inside and out proposes that the natural law of attraction of opposite charge and the simultaneous event  manifestion of Q1  and Q2 at the same real coordinate spatial point , forms an instantaneous bond ,  that allows the two  opposite charges to form a stable binary of energies namely the 7d manifold volume  with a density of 1 .

ρ=1


* qq.jpg (10.79 kB . 665x323 - viewed 2067 times)








Logged
 



Marked as best answer by on 20/06/2024 03:54:55

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: The Universe Inside and Out .
« Reply #21 on: 08/04/2019 17:24:00 »
Page 13

Formation of the 7 dimensional interwoven manifold .

In continuation of the 7D interwoven manifold the universe inside and out now adds a further diagram and model in more detail .  Proposing seven dimensions x,y,z,t,E,S,T ,  the four dimensions of space-time and the added dimensions of Energy , entropy and temperature .
The entropy , energy and temperature of a system being equal and proportional to the xyz dimensions and volume .


* 7d1.jpg (27.93 kB . 665x323 - viewed 2070 times)

bbabb9ccdc0dd33d9cb3481b19ceed17.gif = c961ff0aaa30f9c90e61cffc5ca70778.gif = f3547dd54d1e05af47e52cbc9eebff21.gif=143ff401abab2fc770405a45d99a787c.gif=928231454a9b286313bd7e777409980c.gif=7e6cedc11d0210d5fb0984bbaf0b703f.gif







Logged
 

Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: The Universe Inside and Out .
« Reply #22 on: 08/04/2019 20:00:21 »
Quote from: Thebox on 08/04/2019 13:38:56
Of course they would of because they haven't the information we have now . 

Exactly. Which furthers my point that something being self-evident does not guarantee that it is true, Something that we consider to be self-evident today may turn out to be wrong when we learn more in the future.
Logged
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: The Universe Inside and Out .
« Reply #23 on: 13/04/2019 16:17:54 »
Quote from: Kryptid on 08/04/2019 20:00:21
Quote from: Thebox on 08/04/2019 13:38:56
Of course they would of because they haven't the information we have now .

Exactly. Which furthers my point that something being self-evident does not guarantee that it is true, Something that we consider to be self-evident today may turn out to be wrong when we learn more in the future.
My theory comes complete with the  Never Ever .


* sp.jpg (17.28 kB . 632x441 - viewed 1971 times)


Each section
* space1.jpg (5.83 kB . 284x199 - viewed 1963 times)

No moving parts and no rocket fuel .


Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: The Universe Inside and Out .
« Reply #24 on: 13/04/2019 16:26:14 »
Quote from: Thebox on 13/04/2019 16:17:54
Quote from: Kryptid on 08/04/2019 20:00:21
Quote from: Thebox on 08/04/2019 13:38:56
Of course they would of because they haven't the information we have now .

Exactly. Which furthers my point that something being self-evident does not guarantee that it is true, Something that we consider to be self-evident today may turn out to be wrong when we learn more in the future.
My theory comes complete with the  Never Ever .


* sp.jpg (17.28 kB . 632x441 - viewed 1971 times)


Each section
* space1.jpg (5.83 kB . 284x199 - viewed 1963 times)

No moving parts and no rocket fuel .



Is this meant to be postmodern poetry or what?
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



guest39538

  • Guest
Re: The Universe Inside and Out .
« Reply #25 on: 13/04/2019 16:32:03 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 13/04/2019 16:26:14
Quote from: Thebox on 13/04/2019 16:17:54
Quote from: Kryptid on 08/04/2019 20:00:21
Quote from: Thebox on 08/04/2019 13:38:56
Of course they would of because they haven't the information we have now .

Exactly. Which furthers my point that something being self-evident does not guarantee that it is true, Something that we consider to be self-evident today may turn out to be wrong when we learn more in the future.
My theory comes complete with the  Never Ever .


* sp.jpg (17.28 kB . 632x441 - viewed 1971 times)


Each section
* space1.jpg (5.83 kB . 284x199 - viewed 1963 times)

No moving parts and no rocket fuel .



Is this meant to be postmodern poetry or what?
It's the best spaceship design you will ever see MR C ,  an actual real spaceship like something you'd see on Star Trek .  It uses basic physics which is the surprising thing and it is workable physics .
You can think what you like about my science but I know very well what I'm talking about and how the Universe works . 

I'm British and this is British engineering and physics at its best .  You want see my naval ideas that will work just like my spaceship will work .

P.s The Never Ever is the ships name :D

Added - I know what the gravity mechanism is so obvious as in Newtons laws , every action has an equal and opposite reaction , I worked out anti gravity also .

You should really try to understand that the information I work with is an advanced version of your information .  I am leagues ahead of you in knowing . When you mention space-time to me or relativity , that's like really basic stuff to me now , not very advanced at all .



Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: The Universe Inside and Out .
« Reply #26 on: 13/04/2019 17:25:41 »
I presume this is another thread like this earlier one.
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=76599.msg572071#msg572071
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 1.058 seconds with 38 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.