The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. WHAT IS THE AGE OF SUBATOMIC PARTICLES?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

WHAT IS THE AGE OF SUBATOMIC PARTICLES?

  • 21 Replies
  • 5675 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline puppypower

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1652
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 125 times
Re: WHAT IS THE AGE OF SUBATOMIC PARTICLES?
« Reply #20 on: 30/05/2021 18:29:27 »
One classic property of matter is matter takes up space. Matter can create space by changing phase into forms of matter that needs more and more space. If water goes from liquid to a gas the space requirement increases by 1000. I call the space requirement of matter, distance potential. 

If a blackhole was a true singularity, it cannot contain matter, since matter needs space. Distant matter when acted upon by the gravity of a black hole, will need to phase change into particles states, that require less and less space. At the theoretical singularity of the BB, there is no space left for matter. If a black hole has matter in the center, it is not a true singularity, since matter has distance potential.

For example, hydrogen atoms cannot exist at or below neutron density, since the normal hydrogen atom takes up too much space that way. It will need to change phase into something closer to the neutron, which has much less space requirement. The expansion of space-time is increasing space. Some of this is due to matter changing phase, into fluffier configurations with higher space requirement.

Photons do not take up space. They can superimpose due to their wave nature. If the photons were to become matter and antimatter, within restricted space of the singularity of the BB, since matter takes up space, anti-matter would need to mathematically take up negative space. Anti-matter can annihilate matter, and thereby remove the space requirement of matter. The resultant photons do not take up space. At equilibrium we have a pulsating point.

To get a singularity to expand, we need to generate matter to increase space. However, we will also generate antimatter with its negative space equivalent. Therefore matter and antimatter will need to somehow become segregated, so the space amplifying affects of matter are not cancelled by the negative space nature of antimatter.

One analogy is weather where we get high and low pressure systems that appear as segregated systems, even though they should seek to cancel. What often happens is two or more low pressure systems can combine into one larger lower pressure system; nor easter. In the case of the BB, the high pressure zone would be generated by the segregated matter and its amplified space requirement. The antimatter would segregate into a lower pressure zone; negative pressure.   

In the case of weather, low pressure is connected to the condensation of water vapor into liquid; rain droplets. Water vapor takes up to 1000 times more space than liquid water. The condensation of water lowers the partial pressure of the water within the air; lower pressure due to less space requirement. High pressure is due to water evaporation, adding space to the atmosphere, as water vapor molecules with a partial pressure. Wind goes from high to low pressure; matter to antimatter. The high pressure feeds the low pressure wind and water vapor.

In the case of matter, antimatter and photons, the photons play the role of water in terms of the segregation of matter and anti-matter into high and low pressure. If we increase the number of photons; annihilation, since photons do not take up space, this implies the direction of lower pressure.

Evaporation into higher pressure; matter,  lowers the photon concentration, via matter and antimatter. In this scenario photons and anti-matter are both low pressure inductions, in terms of changes in space requirements. Matter stands by itself as the only source of higher pressure, due to its positive space requirement. The result is photons plus antimatter, separating from matter, with the wind direction; photons, going from matter to antimatter and energy. This separates the waters from the waters; matter and antimatter <----->energy.

The matter causes space to expand; inflation. The attractive forces, which lower space requirements, appear within the low pressure systems of antimatter and photons. The four forces help to compress the space requirements, via the four attractive forces of nature.

We live in a quantum universe. The value of this is a quantum universe saves time. If x,y,z have to happen before a transition can occur, a quantum universe, by reducing the options, saves time. A continuous function universe would have so many extra options that it would take forever to cycle and line up with any set of special needs. A two sided coin; quantum, is easy to use for making decisions in terms of lunch; heads pizza and tails burgers. A billion sided coin, where each side may appear once every thousand years, is not very efficient and would waste time. We may all starve before we get heads or tails. 

By saving time, a quantum universe has extra time and potential energy to spare. It is like getting the job done much faster with less resources than was allocated. What do you do with the extra time and the extra energy? One can start the next project sooner and accumulate resources.

If one was wise, they could be much more proactive and spend the lifetime of anticipated time and resource savings, up front, so the rest of the future quantum jobs, are on all on a tighter time and resource schedule. The quantization of the universe saved time or added time potential up front. Segregation can occur via difference in time, so they interact differently in time.

The analogy is the teacher says, "today we will have a two hour open book test." Everyone panics and starts to shuffles papers. The teacher then says, "I changed my mind. The test will be in one week. Today you can prepare for the test." Now the original task is placed on the back burner and other things are done instead because we added time. If we take away the adde time, and tell the students. "I change my mind, now is the test", the students come to a panic focus.

The segregation of matter and antimatter; quantum states, could come quicker, using the extra time potential savings, of the universe, up front, so that the future work could be tight within the quantum universe, that subsequently appears and evolves. The universe would last less time, than the forever point, but the quantum investment allowing the universe to appear.
Logged
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: WHAT IS THE AGE OF SUBATOMIC PARTICLES?
« Reply #21 on: 30/05/2021 19:17:44 »
Quote from: puppypower on 30/05/2021 18:29:27
One classic property of matter is matter takes up space.
Apparently  electrons don't, and the singularity in a BH doesn't.

Quote from: puppypower on 30/05/2021 18:29:27
I call the space requirement of matter, distance potential. 
So, you came up with a name for something which may not exist, and which will get confused wit the normal uses of the words.
Why do things like that?

Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.281 seconds with 26 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.