[Zer0]

The repeated reference to Antimatter is Amusing.

Makes me ask, When was the last time a documented record of Antimatter colliding with Earth was made?

& Have we Observed any Antimatter stars, planets, moons etc?

[acsinuk (OP)]

Stars are made of antimatter which is why telescopes can only see a shimmering magnetic surface.  The weight of the sun is not 2 x 10^30 kg but is nearer 6 x 10^28 kg once you factor in the electrostatic attraction and magnetic binding forces that at present are being ignored. .#
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3889/3019/1600/simplifiedview.2.png

[Kryptid]

The Sun isn't made of antimatter. We haven't found any stars made of antimatter yet either (at least not definitively).

[Bored chemist]

Stars are made of antimatter

If that was true we would see a huge annihilation radiation field where the solar wind meets our atmosphere.
We don't.
So, we all know you are wrong.

Why post such obvious nonsense?

  The weight of the sun is

Zero. It's in free fall.

[Bored chemist]

http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3889/3019/1600/simplifiedview.2.png

Nurse!
He's on about magnaflux again! Get him some more of his  pills.

[Origin]

Stars are made of antimatter

Also the moon is made of cheese and clouds are made of marshmallow.  The easiest way to see all of this is to eat illegal mushrooms (which I do not recommend!).

[paul cotter]

Pills BC?, nah, that won't cut the cake, too short in duration, what's needed is a depot neuroleptic.

[Zer0]

Stars are made of antimatter which is why telescopes can only see a shimmering magnetic surface.  The weight of the sun is not 2 x 10^30 kg but is nearer 6 x 10^28 kg once you factor in the electrostatic attraction and magnetic binding forces that at present are being ignored. .#
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3889/3019/1600/simplifiedview.2.png

I do not know the Source of your Information.
But i can tell you the Credibility of the Source Matters Alot!

https://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/solar_system/sun/sun_index.html

ps - there are a plethora of potholes on the internet, the sooner you learn to identify them, the better.
(hop)

[acsinuk (OP)]

Pleased to note that the new space project Euclid is according to BBC news investigating dark pressure and dark energy that is forcing the universe apart.
Magnoflux theory explains this at a distance force as an electrostatic force that is 25 times stronger than gravity which hopefully will be confirmed.
No mention is made of searching for non existent dark matter.
https://magnoflux3d.wordpress.com/

[Bored chemist]

Do you realise that repeating the same error doesn't fix it?

[paul cotter]

"Magnoflux"? What a load of gibberish, what the hell has happened to basic science education? Is it not taught anymore? I don't hide the fact that I am 'an old fogey' but I don't believe this nonsense could have arisen with even the primitive science education I received at school.

[Origin]

Magnoflux theory explains this at a distance force as an electrostatic force that is 25 times stronger than gravity which hopefully will be confirmed.

Electrostatic repulsion would not cause the universe to expand, it would cause objects to move around in the universe.
In general it is best to have at least a basic understanding of a subject before trying to develop a hypothesis about that subject.

[acsinuk (OP)]

Geologists seem to believe that the Colorado river formed the canyon but are unable to explain why all the separate layers formed over the last 1,200 million year are exposed when in most other canyons and gorges the river only washes down to a hard rock layer possibly a 100 metres.
The grand canyon is spectacularly over a 1,000 metres deep with multiple layers all exposed together irrespective of whether made of soft sandy or hard granite like material.
Geologists can see that something dramatic happened around 100 million years or so ago, but not how it happened.
Well, the most probable reason could be we were hit by a huge asteroid that bounced off the planet removing a 200km long scar but this would resulted in a huge crater rather than a canyon. But we could have been hit by a horseshoe shaped asteroid made of anti-matter which would annihilate matter kilogram for kilogram on contact regardless of its hardness which would result in what we see today.. 


     

[Origin]

Geologists seem to believe that the Colorado river formed the canyon but are unable to explain why all the separate layers formed over the last 1,200 million year are exposed when in most other canyons and gorges the river only washes down to a hard rock layer possibly a 100 metres.

This is not correct and so anything based on this belief is incorrect.
Here is a list of 10 canyons that show your postulate is incorrect.  These canyons are just in the USA.
https://www.rotasenin.com/deepest-canyons-in-the-united-states/

[paul cotter]

We have heard this nonsense before, where it was thoroughly debunked. I think the mods should delete this as it is identical to it's previous incarnation.

[Bored chemist]

We have heard this nonsense before, where it was thoroughly debunked. I think the mods should delete this as it is identical to it's previous incarnation.

Or just move it to the bottom of his other thread here
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=86292.msg704502

[Bored chemist]

But we could have been hit by a horseshoe shaped asteroid made of anti-matter

Not without having left pretty obvious radiation damage.

[Kryptid]

We have heard this nonsense before, where it was thoroughly debunked. I think the mods should delete this as it is identical to it's previous incarnation.

Or just move it to the bottom of his other thread here
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=86292.msg704502

Done.