The Naked Scientists Forum
On the Lighter Side
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
27/09/2007 22:47:58 »
Lauren Caitlin Upton, Miss Teen South Carolina, in response to: "Recent polls have shown a fifth of Americans can't locate the U.S. on a world map. Why do you think this is?"
I personally believe that U.S. Americans are unable to do so because, uhmmm, some ah people out there in our nation don't have maps and uh, I believe that our, I, education like such as uh, South Africa, and uh, the Iraq, everywhere like such as, and I believe that they should, uhhh, our education over here in the US should help the US, uh, should help South Africa, it should help the Iraq and the Asian countries so we will be able to build up our future, for our children.
What will be your answer?
Reply #1 on:
28/09/2007 13:48:12 »
If you are raised believing your's is the greatest country on the planet, then you will have little interest in any other country. Additionally, as Miss Caitlin ably demonstrated, it helps if you are truly thick.
Observe; collate; conjecture; analyse; hypothesise; test; validate; theorise. Repeat until complete.
Reply #2 on:
29/09/2007 10:33:07 »
Not really ... I believed in foreign countries.
But that was not the scientific prespective.
Isnt this extraordinary to find this girl in a highly competetive country?
How can you explain without using socially biased view?
Was she rich ?
Was she influential?
Was she having great relationships?
If yes then it hardly matters how one performs in a sexual event ,at least in that country.
The beauty peagent is a sexual event.And some would argue otherwise.
BUT the fact is beauty is defined more with sex appeal than so called intelligence.
The Base Of Chemistry
Reply #3 on:
30/09/2007 03:55:03 »
Does that one fifth include babies, and little children?
Neilep Level Member
Reply #4 on:
30/09/2007 17:55:21 »
It's difficult to poll babies and very young children so I guess the poll was confined to adults.
Anyway what's to explain? She is a contestant in a beauty competition. There's no reason why she needs to be bright. Being a pretty blonde isn't correlated with intelligence (whatever that means).
OK, so there are lots of pretty girls taking part in these contests; one makes a complete mess of answering a question and instantly tops the charts on you-tube.
That just says there are lots of people who want to watch others less fortunate than themselves. Unfortunate, perhaps but hardly news.
Of course the statistic (assuming it's true) is a comment on the population of the US as a whole and I don't think it is a favourable comment. I can only presume that either nobody told the US population how to find themselves on a map or they all forgot.
It's hard to see how they could all (well 80% of them,) forgot so I'm forced to the conclusion that nobody taught them.
I think that's poor education; whatever the reasons for it there's no excuse for finding out where you are in relation to the other 6 billion people on this rock.
It may well be that the USA is a bit self centered ("world" baseball competitions anyone?) but even then, the fact that about 95% of us are not from the US really should count for something.
Last Edit: 30/09/2007 18:04:33 by Bored chemist
Please disregard all previous signatures.
Reply #5 on:
30/09/2007 18:04:21 »
She is neither thick, nor without talent.
As previously mentioned, why would she wish to know about other countries when she lives in the land of the free? There are plenty of people in the UK that could not pick major cities out on a map, or tell you what coast blackpool is on. does this make them thick?
She has assessed her talent, and that is her beauty, which she uses in her profession. We all have different talents and use them to our best abilities, she just happens to have a different one to the rest of us...well me, anyway.
Beauty is not just sexual, beauty is may things to many people.
Neilep Level Member
Can't stand the heat, step away from the fire!
Reply #6 on:
30/09/2007 18:19:57 »
Also, to add to Paul's comment...
Her answer maybe defined on the beauty contestants answer alone as how do we know how they assessed the "facts" in the statistics! We should have the same type of curriculum based in our elementary schools, but apparently not! As schools should teach "education" but seem to focus more on skills such as technical, sports, arts, and more. They do not tend to stick to the basics of the 3 R's. Sad, but true, funding plays a bigger part in this as well here in the "land of the free" We as taxpayers depending geographically where we are are taxed according to our economic status! It makes me mad as I am now paying for "tomorrows leaders" a whopping $250.00 usd a month more to "edumucate" another president potentially as Texas has a few presidents here! Now I am paying almost $400 a month for "School Tax" while they are pouncing on our children to do school fundings as well! grrr! Arkansas and South Carolina have a poorer economy and they pay less tax a month.(equivalent I pay a huge amount per month as what they are spending in a YEAR! estimating figures here!)
10 Facts About K-12 Education Funding
The U.S. Constitution leaves the responsibility for public K-12 education with the states.
The responsibility for K-12 education rests with the states under the Constitution. There is also a compelling national interest in the quality of the nation's public schools. Therefore, the federal government, through the legislative process, provides assistance to the states and schools in an effort to supplement, not supplant, state support. The primary source of federal K-12 support began in 1965 with the enactment of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
Annual Secondary Education Expenditures per Student
ESEA authorizes grants for elementary and secondary school programs for children of low-income families; school library resources, textbooks and other instructional materials; supplemental education centers and services; strengthening state education agencies; education research; and professional development for teachers.
The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) is a reauthorization of ESEA. The law's express purposes are to raise achievement for all students and to close the achievement gap. This is done through accountability, research-based instruction, flexibility and options for parents, so that no child is left behind.
Total taxpayer investment in K-12 education in the United States for the 2004-05 school year is estimated to be $536 billion. [ * ]
Even in this current time of the war against terror, taxpayer investment in education exceeds that for national defense. In addition to the K-12 money mentioned above, taxpayers will spend an estimated $373 billion for higher education in the same school year. As depicted on the chart below, the United States is a world leader in education investment. However, nations that spend far less achieve higher levels of student performance.
States and localities are the primary sources of K-12 education funding and always have been.
Total U.S. Expenditures for Elementary and Secondary Education
In the 2004-05 school year, 83 cents out of every dollar spent on education is estimated to come from the state and local levels (45.6 percent from state funds and 37.1 percent from local governments). The federal government's share is 8.3 percent. The remaining 8.9 percent is from private sources, primarily for private schools. [ * * ] This division of support remains consistent with our nation's historic reliance on local control of schools.
The federal share of K-12 spending has risen very quickly, particularly in recent years.
In 1990-91, the federal share of total K-12 spending in the United States was just 5.7 percent. Since that time, it has risen by more than one-third and is now 8.3 percent of the total.
Total education funding has increased substantially in recent years at all levels of government, even when accounting for enrollment increases and inflation.
Total Expenditures per Pupil (for Fall Enrollment)
By the end of the 2004-05 school year, national K-12 education spending will have increased an estimated 105 percent since 1991-92; 58 percent since 1996-97; and 40 percent since 1998-99. On a per-pupil basis and adjusted for inflation, public school funding increased: 24 percent from 1991-92 through 2001-02 (the last year for which such data are available); 19 percent from 1996-97 through 2001-02; and 10 percent from 1998-99 through 2001-02.
Importantly, the increase in funds has been linked to accountability for results, ensuring taxpayers get their money's worth.
Federal funding for two main federal K-12 education programs will have increased by $9.3 billion since 2001, under the president's proposed budget.
Under the president's proposed budget for fiscal year (FY) 2006, 65 percent of the U.S. Department of Education's elementary and secondary school funds would go to help schools with economically disadvantaged students (ESEA, Title I) and to support children with disabilities (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act [IDEA], Part B, Grants to States). If the president's FY 2006 request is enacted, the increases in these programs over the past five years will have substantially exceeded any previous increases over a similar period since the programs were created.
Most federal funds are sent directly to states and local school districts for their use in schools.
Title I Grants for Disadvantaged Children
The president's FY 2006 budget would provide $37.6 billion for K-12 education. Of that amount, 95 percent would be distributed either directly to local districts or to schools and districts through their states. Individual schools would then use these funds for the purposes defined in the programs. Major programs include:
ESEA, Title I: $13.3 billion
IDEA, Part B, Grants to States: $11.1 billion
Improving Teacher Quality: $2.9 billion
21st Century Community Learning Centers: $991.1 million
English Language Learners: $675.8 million
Impact Aid (schools impacted by military bases and other facilities): $1.2 billion
There are no unfunded federal education "mandates." Every federal education law is conditioned on a state or other grantee's decision to accept federal program funds.
Federal education program "requirements" are not unfunded mandates because the conditions in federal law apply only when a state (or other grantee) voluntarily chooses to accept federal funds. Any state that does not want to abide by a federal program's requirements can simply choose not to accept the federal funds associated with that program. While most states choose to accept and use federal program funds, in the past, a few states have forgone funds for various reasons.
The federal commitment to education can be found in the actual dollars earmarked for education.
Federal Spending Under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act
Like all laws passed by Congress, many federal education statutes include limits on how much future Congresses can spend. These are called "authorization caps." Actual amounts spent on education are called "appropriated levels," and they represent the actual federal commitment to education. Authorization caps are occasionally claimed to be "promises" or "goals" for federal education spending. Failure to meet these levels is sometimes claimed to demonstrate that an "unfunded mandate" exists.
The claim is simply untrue. In the history of the United States, actual appropriations have rarely matched authorization levels. If this were the standard, nearly all federal programs supporting agriculture, health, safety, construction, job training and transportation would be below their congressional "goals."
K-12 education is funded at the federal level through a variety of laws and programs.
No Child Left Behind Funding: 2002-06
The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) gives our schools and our country groundbreaking education reform based on stronger accountability for results, more flexibility for states and communities, an emphasis on proven education methods, and more options for parents. Passed with bipartisan support in Congress and signed by President Bush on Jan. 8, 2002, the law represents the most comprehensive revision of federal education programs since the passage of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. NCLB programs in the president's FY 2006 proposed budget include:
Title I, the largest federal K-12 program, would provide over $13 billion to local districts to improve the academic achievement of children in high-poverty schools.
Reading First would supply over $1.1 billion to states to promote the use of scientifically based research to provide high-quality reading instruction for grades K-3.
Improving Teacher Quality Grants would provide states with $2.9 billion for teacher professional development and training.
English Language Acquisition would provide $675.8 million to states to assist schools in improving the education of limited English-proficient children by teaching them English and helping them meet state academic standards.
Other NCLB programs include those to support charter schools; strengthen high school education; improve math and science education; support after-school learning programs and assist American Indian, Alaska Native and migrant students.
Federal Grants to States for Special Education *
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) assists states and local schools in educating children with disabilities. Grants to States under Part B—the second largest federal K-12 program—would provide over $11 billion to states and local schools to assist their efforts.
The Education Sciences Reform Act (ESRA), passed in 2002, created the Institute of Education Sciences (IES), which replaced the Office of Educational Research and Improvement. The law requires more rigorous standards for the conduct and evaluation of education research. NCLB requires that federal funds support educational activities that are backed by scientifically based research. Through sustained programs of research, evaluation and data collection, IES provides evidence of what works to solve the problems and challenges faced by schools and learners.
U.S. Department of Education
This publication is in the public domain. Authorization to reproduce it in whole or in part is granted. While permission to reprint this publication is not necessary, the citation should be: U.S. Department of Education, 10 Facts About K-12 Education Funding, Washington, D.C., 2005.
To order copies of this report,
write to: ED Pubs, Education Publications Center, U.S. Department of Education, P.O. Box 1398, Jessup, Md., 20794-1398;
or fax your request to: (301) 470-1244;
or e-mail your request to: email@example.com;
or call in your request toll-free: 1-877-433-7827 (1-877-4-ED-PUBS). If 877 service is not yet available in your area, call 1-800-872-5327 (1-800-USA-LEARN). Those who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a teletypewriter (TTY), should call 1-800- 437-0833.
or order online at:
This report is also available on the Department's Web site at:
On request, this publication is available in alternate formats, such as Braille, large print, audiotape or computer diskette. For more information, please contact the Department's Alternate Format Center at (202) 260-9895 or (202) 205-8113.
Front cover: Secretary Spellings with students at Burke High School in Boston, Mass., May 2005.
[ * ] Source of funding information in this brochure is the U.S. Department of Education Budget Service and the National Center for Education Statistics unless otherwise noted. [ Return to text ]
[ * * ] Because of rounding, detail does not add to 100 percent. [ Return t
Last Modified: 11/02/2005
Welcome to ED.gov
"Just Me, Lo" Loretta
Reply #7 on:
30/09/2007 20:03:57 »
You must also take in to account that beauty queens are not supposed to show any intellect, just stand there and look cute. Profess to wanting world peace and other cliche statements. They are also performing and playing up to a stereotype.
Neilep Level Member
Can't stand the heat, step away from the fire!
Reply #8 on:
30/09/2007 20:35:16 »
So true. So sad.
"Just Me, Lo" Loretta