The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Life Sciences
  3. Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution
  4. do plants have senses?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

do plants have senses?

  • 3 Replies
  • 10214 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

paul.fr

  • Guest
do plants have senses?
« on: 26/10/2007 19:19:58 »
sight, touch, smell, hearing and taste. They are the 5 senses, i presume most mammals have them, but what about plants do they have those 5? Or do they have plant specific senses?
Logged
 



Marked as best answer by on 01/07/2025 19:55:20

Offline DoctorBeaver

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12653
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
  • Undo Best Answer
  • do plants have senses?
    « Reply #1 on: 26/10/2007 19:30:38 »
    I remember reading about some research a few years back where music was played to some plants and not to others. The plants subjected to the music grew larger. I didn't see the research paper itself so I can't comment on its validity.

    (There is no guarantee this would work with Spice Girls records)
    Logged
     

    another_someone

    • Guest
    do plants have senses?
    « Reply #2 on: 26/10/2007 19:42:39 »
    We actually have more than 5 senses.  We can detect heat - that is not touch as such.  Some animals (it is debatable is maybe, in a restricted sense, most animals) can detect electric fields, and the same is true of the Earth's magnetism.

    Taste and smell are intertwined - but if you want to look at them separately, then what about the functioning of the vomeronasal organ, which although is much debated about whether it has any function in humans, is used for detecting pheromones in some other mammals (such as mice).

    Clearly, plants do not have a nervous system, nor a brain, so the way they sense and process information about their environment must be different from that which is true for animals.  So the comparison, if it is to be made, must be about what plants sense, rather than how they sense.  They can sense light (does that mean they can see?), they can sense physical contact (does that mean they have a sense of touch), they can detect chemicals in their environment (does that mean they have a sense of taste or smell?), and possibly they can sense vibration (does that mean they may be able to hear?).

    Even bacteria can respond to light, heat, and chemicals (and some, to magnetic or electrical fields) - but again, they have no nervous system, so how do you compare their senses to animal senses?
    Logged
     

    Offline Andrew K Fletcher

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 2333
    • Activity:
      0%
    • KIS Keep It Simple
    do plants have senses?
    « Reply #3 on: 26/10/2007 21:49:06 »
    And they can catch insects Venus fly trap or should I say venous return fly trap as the trap closes due to a change in internal pressures. I Beleive because the insect stimulates the release of solutes to flow down the stem and in doing so generates the negative tension in the return folw which closes the leaves. I suspect also that this happens with the prayer plant that closes its leaves at night and opens them in the morning. And this also gives us an answer to phototropism and gravitropism which I believe has been mentioned in another thread awaiting an explanation using conventional beliefs in fluid transport, to which I await a reply with interest.

    Andrew
    Logged
    Science is continually evolving. Nothing is set in stone. Question everything and everyone. Always consider vested interests as a reason for miss-direction. But most of all explore and find answers that you are comfortable with
     



    • Print
    Pages: [1]   Go Up
    « previous next »
    Tags:
     
    There was an error while thanking
    Thanking...
    • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
      Privacy Policy
      SMFAds for Free Forums
    • Naked Science Forum ©

    Page created in 1.558 seconds with 32 queries.

    • Podcasts
    • Articles
    • Get Naked
    • About
    • Contact us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Policy
    • Subscribe to newsletter
    • We love feedback

    Follow us

    cambridge_logo_footer.png

    ©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.