The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Life Sciences
  3. Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution
  4. Unidentified Flying Objection to the rules of butterfly flight
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Unidentified Flying Objection to the rules of butterfly flight

  • 3 Replies
  • 6982 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Andrew K Fletcher (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2333
  • Activity:
    0%
  • KIS Keep It Simple
Unidentified Flying Objection to the rules of butterfly flight
« on: 15/01/2008 09:01:40 »
This Butterfly flew like a bird and was in total control of the air, unlike every butterfly I have ever seen, except for the Humming Bird Hawk Moth. It flew like a top gun pilot in a fighter jet, was very inquisitive about us, appeared to not be bothered by our party of five who were getting pretty close to it. There were 4 of these evolutionary gems performing on a very warm sunny day. If anyone can identify these It may help to understand whether this is a common aeronautic marvel or will remain an unidentified flying objectional.













Logged
Science is continually evolving. Nothing is set in stone. Question everything and everyone. Always consider vested interests as a reason for miss-direction. But most of all explore and find answers that you are comfortable with
 



Offline opus

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 326
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
Unidentified Flying Objection to the rules of butterfly flight
« Reply #1 on: 15/01/2008 20:42:39 »
no idea, but it looks lovely..
Logged
 

Offline donut

  • First timers
  • *
  • 5
  • Activity:
    0%
Unidentified Flying Objection to the rules of butterfly flight
« Reply #2 on: 16/01/2008 01:01:21 »
Not sure about your butterfly Andrew, it's the wrong colour for an 'Admiral' though the markings are the right sort of style. There are probably variations within species. Have a look on butterfly-conservation dot org, they have an 'identfier' thingy you can try.  [;)]
Logged
 

Offline Andrew K Fletcher (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2333
  • Activity:
    0%
  • KIS Keep It Simple
Unidentified Flying Objection to the rules of butterfly flight
« Reply #3 on: 16/01/2008 07:45:38 »
Thanks for the link, have written to them asking for identification, will report back.
Logged
Science is continually evolving. Nothing is set in stone. Question everything and everyone. Always consider vested interests as a reason for miss-direction. But most of all explore and find answers that you are comfortable with
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.721 seconds with 32 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.