The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Chemistry
  4. Why is the sigma orbital higher in energy than the pi in carbon monoxide?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Why is the sigma orbital higher in energy than the pi in carbon monoxide?

  • 4 Replies
  • 10918 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline StereoChemist (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 7
  • Activity:
    0%
Why is the sigma orbital higher in energy than the pi in carbon monoxide?
« on: 26/04/2008 02:52:32 »
my question is this, in carbon monoxide you have six p orbitals combining (3 from carbon 3 from oxygen) to form two pi molecular orbitals (px and py) and one sigma orbital (pz).  So why is the sigma orbital HIGHER in energy than the pi MO's generated.  The sigma orbitals overlap better I believe which would correspond to lower bonding MO created (i think better over lap means lower bonding and higher nonboding orbitals created)  Also we all know that pi electrons are usually more reactive, so wouldn't that mean they should br the higher energy ones, but they aren't they are lower. 

The only reason that makes sense that i can think of for this is that the sigma electrons are in a space of higher electron density (the plane of nuclei)  and would therefore have more energy.  It still doesn't sit right with me that pi electrons are more reactive and moving around more but they are lower energy than the sigma orbital. can somebody clear this up for me?
« Last Edit: 30/05/2008 12:07:40 by chris »
Logged
 



Offline StereoChemist (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 7
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Why is the sigma orbital higher in energy than the pi in carbon monoxide?
« Reply #1 on: 01/05/2008 19:22:56 »
c'mon second question i've asked on this forum with zero answers.
Logged
 

Offline sorincosofret

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 204
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Why is the sigma orbital higher in energy than the pi in carbon monoxide?
« Reply #2 on: 14/05/2008 12:30:32 »
Dear Stereo chemist,

Look a little bit at the folowing link http://www.elkadot.com/atomic/Coordinative_bound.htm and read on the coordinative bound link and you will discover another type of answer....for CO structure

Regards,

Sorin Cosofret


<mod edit - link changed directly to your hypothesis page so it's not just spamming your site>
« Last Edit: 14/05/2008 12:55:58 by BenV »
Logged
 

Offline BenV

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1502
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 3 times
Re: Why is the sigma orbital higher in energy than the pi in carbon monoxide?
« Reply #3 on: 14/05/2008 12:54:30 »
Sorry StereoChemist, I've a zoology background so can't help with this one.  I'm sure someone will be able to help.
Logged
 

Offline StereoChemist (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 7
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Why is the sigma orbital higher in energy than the pi in carbon monoxide?
« Reply #4 on: 29/05/2008 22:20:43 »
I get what that article is saying about CO but it still doesn't explain why the two similar orbitals (i called them pi orbitals in my original post) are lower in energy than the different orbital (i called it a sigma bond in my original post, the article refers to it as s coordinative bond).
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 1.407 seconds with 39 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.