The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Effective radiated power
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Effective radiated power

  • 6 Replies
  • 5743 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline syhprum (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 5198
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 74 times
Effective radiated power
« on: 04/07/2008 09:23:03 »
A pair of eclipsing pulsars have been monitored for the last five years to confirm general relativity as regards precession.
These pulsars are a long way away I would be interested in estimates of the ERP of the radio emission's and how this compares with what SETI have available
Logged
 



Offline Alan McDougall

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1285
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 16 times
Effective radiated power
« Reply #1 on: 04/07/2008 17:28:11 »
I don't get your point all radiation ,light and otherwise would recede at the same fundamental constant
Logged
The Truth remains the Truth regardless of our beliefs or opinions the Truth is always the Truth even if we know it or do not know it (The Truth remains the Truth)
 

Offline graham.d

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2207
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
Effective radiated power
« Reply #2 on: 04/07/2008 22:25:59 »
Are you speaking of B1957 +20? I am unsure of how this relates to SETI. There are a handful of eclipsing pulsars and I am sure there is reported information as to their ERP. This normally correlates to their estimated distance from the dispersion of the emitted radiation but because there are so few it may not be very relevant.

As all these pulsars are within our galaxy, Hubble recession is not an issue.
Logged
 

Offline Soul Surfer

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3389
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 8 times
  • keep banging the rocks together
    • ian kimber's web workspace
Effective radiated power
« Reply #3 on: 04/07/2008 23:47:15 »
There appears to be some fundamental misunderstandings between the questions and the answers here.

Firstly the reference should be quoted or the observations described in a bit more detail.  I presume the abbreviation ERP means Effective radiated power  A term used in relation do radio transmitters.  This is valid because most pulsars are observed at radio frequencies and not optically.

What I think syhprum is asking is:- we are listening to radio signals from a great distance in some detail.  How does the power in this radio signal relate to any power we could transmit from the earth?

The truth is that any signals emitted from a star are probably many orders of magnitude greater than the best that we could do principally because even though neutron stars are quite small  The energies involved are still vastly greater that the sort of thing that we could generate with the most powerful signal sources on the earth.
Logged
Learn, create, test and tell
evolution rules in all things
God says so!
 

Offline Pumblechook

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 569
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
Effective radiated power
« Reply #4 on: 05/07/2008 00:08:50 »
Our Sun puts out nearly 400 trillion-trillion Watts.  4 x 10^26 Watts.   I don't know how the stars we can see compare and how far the Sun could be seen or detected??   

Earthly transmitters reach the low MegaWatts of ERP so the Sun is of the order of 10^20 times more powerful than our most powerful transmissions.  100,000,000,000,000,000,000  times.

Our radio broadcast transmissions are far too weak to reach much more than 100 Million Km.  TV would be far less. 

« Last Edit: 05/07/2008 00:13:24 by Pumblechook »
Logged
 



Offline syhprum (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 5198
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 74 times
Effective radiated power
« Reply #5 on: 05/07/2008 17:49:00 »
I believe that the Acribo radar installation has a 1 Mw transmitter and an antenna gain of 60 db giving a ERP of 1000 Gw, infinitesimal compared with that of pulsars but I have been unable to find any actual estimates of their power
Logged
 

Offline Alan McDougall

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1285
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 16 times
Effective radiated power
« Reply #6 on: 05/07/2008 20:54:31 »
Quote
I believe that the Acribo radar installation has a 1 Mw transmitter and an antenna gain of 60 db giving a ERP of 1000 Gw, infinitesimal compared with that of pulsars but I have been unable to find any actual estimates of their power

In 1974 the Acribo telescope pulsed out on very comprehensive digital message towards somewhere in the cosmos.

Of course if any sentient being receives it humanity will long been gone by then.

I will look it up.
Logged
The Truth remains the Truth regardless of our beliefs or opinions the Truth is always the Truth even if we know it or do not know it (The Truth remains the Truth)
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.346 seconds with 42 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.