The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Entanglement - spooky action at a distance
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Entanglement - spooky action at a distance

  • 6 Replies
  • 5673 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Fluid_thinker (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 54
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
Entanglement - spooky action at a distance
« on: 10/07/2008 11:17:14 »
This is a fascinating phenomena that has stopped and started many times

I know that in recent years that various experiments have been proven experimentally.

Has anyone started to think of any practical applications?
Logged
 



Offline Alan McDougall

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1285
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 16 times
Entanglement - spooky action at a distance
« Reply #1 on: 10/07/2008 14:07:03 »
Well quantum computing for one and perhaps even insant information transfer across the vastness of the universe.

Regards

Alan
Logged
The Truth remains the Truth regardless of our beliefs or opinions the Truth is always the Truth even if we know it or do not know it (The Truth remains the Truth)
 

Offline JP

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3346
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 3 times
Entanglement - spooky action at a distance
« Reply #2 on: 10/07/2008 15:01:51 »
Instant information transfer is probably not going to happen--there is a tiny bit of disagreement among scientists, but the general consensus is that you need to send classical signals on top of entanglement in order to send information, and classical signals are limited by the speed of light.

Another application is in quantum cryptography.  Since any observation changes quantum systems, you can use entanglement to help send an encryption key and to be able to detect if someone has listened in on what you sent.
Logged
 

Offline Fluid_thinker (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 54
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
Entanglement - spooky action at a distance
« Reply #3 on: 10/07/2008 17:24:52 »
I agree cryptography is a natural progression based on the fact that it is impossible to retrospectively know the quantum state.

e.g. A * B does not equal B * A

Are there known faculties working on this?


Logged
 

Offline DoctorBeaver

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12653
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
Entanglement - spooky action at a distance
« Reply #4 on: 10/07/2008 20:39:12 »
Fluid-thinker - welcome to TNS.

If by "faculties" you mean is it being researched at universties, then the answer is yes; Oslo, Calgary & Boston among them. Although I don't know for certain, I should be highly surprised if CalTech and MIT aren't having a little fiddle with it too.
Logged
 



Offline syhprum

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 5198
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 74 times
Entanglement - spooky action at a distance
« Reply #5 on: 11/07/2008 19:37:49 »
Do we need better cryptography?, there are already better ways to get secret information than by trying to crack codes with massive computers.
Logged
 

Offline JP

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3346
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 3 times
Entanglement - spooky action at a distance
« Reply #6 on: 11/07/2008 21:34:33 »
It's not really better cryptography.  It's a way of ensuring that someone can't tap your line and get your encryption key.  Whether we need it or not is an argument that could be made, but that kind of security is beyond what can be provided by classical information transfer.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.814 seconds with 41 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.