[Madidus_Scientia]

Yep, asked the question, still waiting on a reply.

[Madidus_Scientia]

Hatred is a strong word. If you have percieved emotion and hate simply because I criticised your theory then you must be very sensitive indeed. A big part of science is peer review and criticism, a new theory or idea is never going to go unchallenged, and the proposer of the theory should always be prepared to either defend the idea or accept the flaws pointed out in it like a true scientist and get on with it.

[lyner]

Ian; you are such a 'girlie'.
Stop all this emotional rubbish and behave yourself properly in these conversations.
People on this forum don't contribute to it so that they can have a bitching session. Why not just address the Scientific issues and leave out the veiled and unveiled personal remarks? Neither I nor anyone else whose posts I have read wants anything other than to discuss the Science involved.
There are plenty of  Forums run by and for cranks. Go to one of them if you can't be reasonable.
If you want to learn how to write properly, read some of the threads which you don't contribute to and see how it's done.

[Ian Scott (OP)]

Sophie

don't reply to me and you will be happy.

Otherwise seek professional advice on your anger issues.

[Flyberius]

Sophie

don't reply to me and you will be happy.

Otherwise seek professional advice on your anger issues.

lolololololol

Another entry in the quackery hall of fame.  You dont think a corporation would have cashed in on this simple idea.  What better proof that it doesnt work than that?

How about you give us a video demonstration of the experiment.  Of YOU doing it.  You may mask yourself if you fear for your safety.

Simple as.  You can go on Dragons Den and make Miwwions by this time next year.

[Ian Scott (OP)]

bye don't reply

[Ian Scott (OP)]

ignorance reigns

[Ian Scott (OP)]

ignorance reigns

[Ian Scott (OP)]

What a long train of hate-threads to a simple post

"Yes I like to think and this is why I like this web site. So here is another question - if we wish to consider it.

Rectilinear motion back and forth provides no composite momentum - so why not add angular rotation?

If you rotate at the same rate then you will find a force and so therefore if you make a machine this it would levitate if you "point it up"

I can describe this easily enough I ask this question though - anyone here want to levitate?

Imagine yourself on an ice surface with a rod of metal - pull it in to move forward. Then rotate a 1/2 turn and push it back.
 Wouldn't you continue?

This system is imperfect. Three phase is better and point the system up to levitate.

If I put money into this can anyone say why bit wouldn't work or just be blowing smoke?"

I thought scientists asked and thought? Prove me wrong.

[ukmicky]

Ian

I don't normally do this in open Forum and at present I'm only slapping your wrists but after reading some of your replies i feel that you have on occasions been rude and discourteous to the members of this forum. You risk alienating the very people you wish to converse with and is something which will not be tolerated should it continue.
 
As you say you like this forum so please bear in mind what i have said.

Regards

Michael

Forum Moderator

[paul.fr]

Sophie

don't reply to me and you will be happy.

Otherwise seek professional advice on your anger issues.

Perhaps it would be easier if you could list the people you do wish to reply!