The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Large Hadron (Proton) Collider Switerland to be switch on Wednesday ???
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Large Hadron (Proton) Collider Switerland to be switch on Wednesday ???

  • 6 Replies
  • 6138 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Alan McDougall (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1285
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 15 times
    • View Profile
Large Hadron (Proton) Collider Switerland to be switch on Wednesday ???
« on: 05/09/2008 09:49:45 »
Greetings forum,

I am sure many are aware of this event and the many questions around it

The Large Hadron particle collide in Switzerland is to be switched on Wednesday with much speculation in the media (eg create a black hole that will swallow the earth nonsense.


Hadron is just another word for Proton and these protons are going to be accelerated to as near as possible to the speed of light in opposite directions

The question is if these particles are accelerate within a tad of light speed in opposite direction, would they then collide at greater than the speed of light??



Regards

Alan
Logged
The Truth remains the Truth regardless of our beliefs or opinions the Truth is always the Truth even if we know it or do not know it (The Truth remains the Truth)
 



Offline lightarrow

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 4605
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 13 times
    • View Profile
Large Hadron (Proton) Collider Switerland to be switch on Wednesday ???
« Reply #1 on: 05/09/2008 10:14:08 »
Quote from: Alan McDougall on 05/09/2008 09:49:45
Greetings forum,

I am sure many are aware of this event and the many questions around it

The Large Hadron particle collide in Switzerland is to be switched on Wednesday with much speculation in the media (eg create a black hole that will swallow the earth nonsense.


Hadron is just another word for Proton and these protons are going to be accelerated to as near as possible to the speed of light in opposite directions

The question is if these particles are accelerate within a tad of light speed in opposite direction, would they then collide at greater than the speed of light??

if v1 is proton1 speed and v2 is proton2 speed (regardless of the sign, that is, in modulus) then the relative speed V is not v1 + v2 but:

V = (v1 + v2)(1 + v1v2/c2)

This formula is always true, at every speed. Try to compute V for several speeds v1 and v2, low and near or equal to c.

Edit: of course the formula is not valid for protons only  [:)]
« Last Edit: 05/09/2008 10:17:27 by lightarrow »
Logged
 

Offline Alan McDougall (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1285
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 15 times
    • View Profile
Large Hadron (Proton) Collider Switerland to be switch on Wednesday ???
« Reply #2 on: 05/09/2008 10:52:24 »
Light arrow,

So relativity still holds true, so if I could assume the Hadrons were spaceships they would still observe each other as approaching one another at less than light speed.

What about the observer subject synchronised to the microwave back ground

Alan
Logged
The Truth remains the Truth regardless of our beliefs or opinions the Truth is always the Truth even if we know it or do not know it (The Truth remains the Truth)
 

lyner

  • Guest
Large Hadron (Proton) Collider Switerland to be switch on Wednesday ???
« Reply #3 on: 05/09/2008 17:20:58 »
Quote
What about the observer subject synchronised to the microwave back ground
It will apply when they are launched in opposite directions at equal speeds relative to any inertial frame.
I'm not sure what your particular  'frame' actually means but I think you are trying to say 'the real stationary, Cartesian,  frame of the universe' or something like that. But it is not a proper concept, these days. Any inertial frame will do - although there will always be some tiny influence of GR in practice. Even then the limit of c applies.
Logged
 

Offline rich42

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 20
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Large Hadron (Proton) Collider Switerland to be switch on Wednesday ???
« Reply #4 on: 05/09/2008 20:38:59 »
Hi, just stumbled on this site and thought I'd jump in!

If you are standing still (compared to earth's surface) and watching two particles approach each other, you will see one moving right at almost c, and the other moving left at almost c.
Now imagine you are moving with one of the particles so that from your point of view, it is stationary. You see the other particle approaching you and measure its speed relative to you, and you find it is still less than c, rather than 2 x c as you'd expect. 
How can these both be true at the same time? When you are moving with respect to another object, the space between you and the object 'contracts' (from the maths of special relativity). Therefore the distance you measure between the two particles is a lot shorter if you are travelling with one of the particles than if you are standing still in the lab.
Example: If, when travelling with one particle, the distance measured between the pair is 25% of that measured in the lab, their measured relative speed will be 25% of that you measure in the lab. 

Edit: Alan, to answer your question about the observer, they will observe each particle moving (relative to them) at nearly c. The relative speed they will measure between the two particles to be almost 2c, and that's fine. You are not seeing anything moving at greater than c relative to you at any point in this process, and that's what counts!

Richard
« Last Edit: 05/09/2008 20:53:53 by rich42 »
Logged
 



Offline Alan McDougall (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1285
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 15 times
    • View Profile
Large Hadron (Proton) Collider Switerland to be switch on Wednesday ???
« Reply #5 on: 06/09/2008 05:28:18 »
Richard

A warm welcome

 
Quote
Edit: Alan, to answer your question about the observer, they will observe each particle moving (relative to them) at nearly c. The relative speed they will measure between the two particles to be almost 2c, and that's fine. You are not seeing anything moving at greater than c relative to you at any point in this process, and that's what counts!


Of course they are moving at near light speed like two bullets approaching each other on a fatal head on collision course , relativity does not permit them to exceed light speed Physic's sometimes makes no sense. God does play dice and he cheats at times.

Strangly if they were receding from each other at 99.9 C they would see that, if of course given they could observe and calculate that

Regards

 
« Last Edit: 06/09/2008 13:09:28 by Alan McDougall »
Logged
The Truth remains the Truth regardless of our beliefs or opinions the Truth is always the Truth even if we know it or do not know it (The Truth remains the Truth)
 

Offline rich42

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 20
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Large Hadron (Proton) Collider Switerland to be switch on Wednesday ???
« Reply #6 on: 06/09/2008 11:50:47 »
Quote from: Alan McDougall on 06/09/2008 05:28:18
Richard

A warm welcome

Strangle if they were receding from each other at 99.9 C they would see that, if of course given they could observe and calculate that

Regards

 

Thanks for the welcome Alan!
If they were approaching or receding from each other at a speed you measure in the lab as 99.9% of c, this same length contraction/time dilation effect would mean that one particle still sees the other moving at a slower speed, about 70-80% of c.
It's not an effect which switches on when the relative speed exceeds c, the same applies (just on a very small scale) when you consider two cars approaching each other. Their relative speed will always be measured as larger if you stand by the side of the road than if you are in one of the cars, just by an immeasurably small amount!

Richard
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

Why are small bubbles white, but large bubbles are see through?

Started by thedocBoard Chemistry

Replies: 2
Views: 3428
Last post 16/10/2013 15:13:48
by dlorde
How large is a food "portion"?

Started by syhprumBoard Physiology & Medicine

Replies: 12
Views: 5695
Last post 04/03/2017 00:22:07
by alancalverd
Can we "see" a proton?

Started by Maniax101Board Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 5
Views: 8836
Last post 18/01/2011 09:24:08
by CliffordK
How can a small change in CO2 make a large change in climate?

Started by Imogen Game Board The Environment

Replies: 9
Views: 8172
Last post 28/03/2019 07:42:02
by ConnorGunning
Do small bubbles rise at a different speed than large bubbles?

Started by AndroidNeoxBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 6
Views: 9518
Last post 16/04/2013 11:33:58
by evan_au
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.124 seconds with 49 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.