0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
SC what is best.Sitting down doing nothing.Or testing your ideas to see if they work?But you are right in that I'm a doubter:)I think though that AB knows that i doubt.
Could you invent a supersonic aircraft or a TV or a computer by trial and error?Which theories are you prepared to accept and which ones do you reject?Are you going to develop the whole of your Science by trial and error?You are being selective and totally subjective about this matter.Why are you involving yourself with a Science forum if you don't subscribe to the fundamentals of Science?
All of science starts with a hypotheses
QuoteAll of science starts with a hypotheses No - it starts with a whole history behind it. It then makes informed hypotheses, based on intelligent analysis of what's been found out already. It does not waste its time in half thought out nonsense.What you are doing is not Science, it's romance, to put it kindest.
So you think Newon and Einstein both started from scratch, do you?Actually, they built on existing and well tested Science. Anyone who starts off on a new, uninformed, track is at serious risk of wasting their time. Be a bit humble about this business; take advice, learn some Science and avoid wasting your time (and that of many other people).
Einstein's theories went against mainstream science
Ah, 'zero point energy' do sounds like a way to get 'free' energy. M..m.aybe???
I think that it might have something to do with this being a very factual site.When I read interesting ideas I kind of forget it at times.. . . . . A cool hobby keep you 'on your toes'.. . . . . . .
AB Hammer,You are asking us to invest our time. You have, at the moment, nothing to show but ideas.The ideas are decidely suspect.Don't spend any more of your time posting here until you have a real concrete example you can show us. You can spend the rest of yopur life typing and you won't convince anyone.If you make the thing work then you will convince everyone instantly.