0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
If it was reliably true then every dormitory, be it school, army or whatever, in the world would have at least one unfortunate victim of this prank.
Can you verify that hypothesis?
Ignoring the ethics of experimenting on babies, surely a set of results that said "Babies with hand in water - all found to have wet nappies vs babies with dry hands also all found to have wet nappies too" doesn't really tell you much?I think the original myth/story is about people old enough to not normally wet the bed. Looks like we still need some volunteers.(and is it my imagination or is this a rather odd thread?)
Quote from: Bored chemist on 18/12/2008 18:56:38Ignoring the ethics of experimenting on babies, surely a set of results that said "Babies with hand in water - all found to have wet nappies vs babies with dry hands also all found to have wet nappies too" doesn't really tell you much?I think the original myth/story is about people old enough to not normally wet the bed. Looks like we still need some volunteers.(and is it my imagination or is this a rather odd thread?)LOL...yes, it is an odd thread, but sometimes I think of odd things. Actually, I was watching an episode of "House", where he (House) put Wilson's hand in a bowl of water, it never showed if it worked or not. It got me wondering about the science behind it and if it would work on my brother who is horrible and evil and needs to be paid back for numerous hateful pranks!
LOL...yes, it is an odd thread, but sometimes I think of odd things. Actually, I was watching an episode of "House", where he (House) put Wilson's hand in a bowl of water, it never showed if it worked or not. It got me wondering about the science behind it and if it would work on my brother who is horrible and evil and needs to be paid back for numerous hateful pranks!