The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. electric field lines
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

electric field lines

  • 9 Replies
  • 6066 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline labview1958 (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 104
  • Activity:
    0%
electric field lines
« on: 16/01/2009 08:45:46 »
Why do electric field lines are drawn away from a positive charge and towards for a negative charge. Is it a conventional method or there is some physics behind it?
Logged
 
 



Offline Chemistry4me

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7705
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
electric field lines
« Reply #1 on: 16/01/2009 08:53:34 »
Conventional current? Back then they thought that electrons flowed from the positive terminal to the negative terminal.
« Last Edit: 16/01/2009 08:55:09 by Chemistry4me »
Logged
 

Offline Soul Surfer

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3389
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 8 times
  • keep banging the rocks together
    • ian kimber's web workspace
electric field lines
« Reply #2 on: 16/01/2009 10:12:52 »
The start of the study of electricity came from static electricity generated by rubbing materials with cloths notably glass rods with silk to charge a rod one way and ebonite(plastic) rods with fur  to generate the opposite charge on the rod.

At the time they created the models and convention the choice of "positive" and "negative" (or red and green  they could have used anything)  was purely arbitrary as they had no idea of the nature of the charge carriers.
Logged
Learn, create, test and tell
evolution rules in all things
God says so!
 

lyner

  • Guest
electric field lines
« Reply #3 on: 16/01/2009 10:30:39 »
Quote from: Chemistry4me on 16/01/2009 08:53:34
Conventional current? Back then they thought that electrons flowed from the positive terminal to the negative terminal.
The original model of electricity didn't involve electrons. It didn't consider charge to be quantised at all but had to choose a 'sign' and happened to make an unfortunate (for students) choice.
Logged
 

Offline Chemistry4me

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7705
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
electric field lines
« Reply #4 on: 16/01/2009 10:36:37 »
Quote from: sophiecentaur on 16/01/2009 10:30:39
The original model of electricity didn't involve electrons. It didn't consider charge to be quantised at all but had to choose a 'sign' and happened to make an unfortunate (for students) choice.
Opps... [:I] [:I] Okay, thank you [:)].
Logged
 



Offline labview1958 (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 104
  • Activity:
    0%
electric field lines
« Reply #5 on: 16/01/2009 11:37:39 »
I am talking about electrostatic positive and negative charges. Why are field lines drawn away from a positive charge.

 
Logged
 
 

Offline lightarrow

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 4605
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 16 times
electric field lines
« Reply #6 on: 16/01/2009 11:49:00 »
Quote from: labview1958 on 16/01/2009 11:37:39
I am talking about electrostatic positive and negative charges. Why are field lines drawn away from a positive charge. 
The electric field is a vector; its direction is the direction of a force applied on a positive charge, by definition. Since two positive charges repel each other and a negative and a positive attracts each other, the electric field direction must go away of a positive charge and towards a negative one.
Logged
 

Offline LeeE

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3382
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 3 times
    • Spatial
electric field lines
« Reply #7 on: 16/01/2009 17:13:09 »
Isn't this just because we live in a matter universe and not an antimatter one?  That is, we deal with a flow of electrons, and not positrons?
Logged
...And its claws are as big as cups, and for some reason it's got a tremendous fear of stamps! And Mrs Doyle was telling me it's got magnets on its tail, so if you're made out of metal it can attach itself to you! And instead of a mouth it's got four arses!
 

Offline lightarrow

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 4605
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 16 times
electric field lines
« Reply #8 on: 16/01/2009 18:00:05 »
Quote from: LeeE on 16/01/2009 17:13:09
Isn't this just because we live in a matter universe and not an antimatter one?  That is, we deal with a flow of electrons, and not positrons?
What would change in that case?
Logged
 



lyner

  • Guest
electric field lines
« Reply #9 on: 16/01/2009 21:34:08 »
I think you need to check up on what constitutes matter and antimatter, particles and antiparticles.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.834 seconds with 53 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.