who will invent infinity value ?

Madidus_Scientia · « **Reply #20 on:** 18/02/2009 15:47:45 »

∞^∞ + 1

Don_1 · « **Reply #21 on:** 18/02/2009 16:33:16 »

[diagram=429_0]

Bored chemist · « **Reply #22 on:** 18/02/2009 19:39:12 »

This guy did quite a lot on infinity, including proving that there are at least two different infinities- one is bigger than the other.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg_Cantor

Chemistry4me · « **Reply #23 on:** 19/02/2009 07:27:17 »

∞^∞ + (∞^∞ x ∞^∞)^∞

Don_1 · « **Reply #24 on:** 19/02/2009 08:51:47 »

Is this going to go on ad infinitum?

dentstudent · « **Reply #25 on:** 19/02/2009 09:16:55 »

Quote from: Chemistry4me on 19/02/2009 07:27:17

∞^∞ + (∞^∞ x ∞^∞)^∞

Quote from: Don_1 on 19/02/2009 08:51:47

Is this going to go on ad infinitum?

Well, it shouldn't, because:

∞^∞ + (∞^∞ x ∞^∞)^∞ still equals ∞

It'll probably be ad nauseum

Chemistry4me · « **Reply #26 on:** 19/02/2009 09:24:08 »

I'm getting ∞^∞ ads.

Don_1 · « **Reply #27 on:** 19/02/2009 09:56:35 »

Quote from: Chemistry4me on 19/02/2009 09:24:08

I'm getting ∞^∞ ads.

Would that be Google Ad∞∞ium?

Chemistry4me · « **Reply #28 on:** 19/02/2009 10:00:23 »

You mean G∞gle Ad∞∞ium?
Yes.

Don_1 · « **Reply #29 on:** 19/02/2009 10:04:19 »

But of course, my mistake. How remiss of me!

Andrew K Fletcher · « **Reply #30 on:** 20/02/2009 14:08:52 »

Quote from: Chemistry4me on 19/02/2009 07:27:17

∞^∞ + (∞^∞ x ∞^∞)^∞

looking for the = sign have you forgot it?

Chemistry4me · « **Reply #31 on:** 20/02/2009 22:50:36 »

Ah, very clever sir!

Raghavendra · « **Reply #32 on:** 02/06/2009 08:33:34 »

If i am not wrong i have an answer for the infinity only for space w.r.t to time
I will not exlain in detail it is to be proved ∞= [6.28522 + D] &
∞=
n+1
(6.2852)
(6.28522)

Chemistry4me · « **Reply #33 on:** 02/06/2009 08:50:18 »

Quote from: Raghavendra on 02/06/2009 08:33:34

If i am not wrong i have an

That's the problem, I think you are. Unless you can show clear evidence and actually explain it.

Yomi · « **Reply #34 on:** 02/06/2009 08:56:00 »

Quote from: Raghavendra on 02/06/2009 08:33:34

If i am not wrong i have an answer for the infinity only for space w.r.t to time
I will not exlain in detail it is to be proved ∞= [6.28522 + D] &
∞=
n+1
(6.2852)
(6.28522)

Actually to understand what u r speaking off need some proof to get digested so explain in detail or what is the use of that hint u have given here?

?

Chemistry4me · « **Reply #35 on:** 02/06/2009 09:00:14 »

Why are you telling us then!

Raghavendra · « **Reply #36 on:** 02/06/2009 09:08:39 »

infinity value... i was just checking out anybody would ask relation on this topic that's why? i said

Chemistry4me · « **Reply #37 on:** 02/06/2009 09:11:56 »

Well I did ask and you haven't given me any evidence at all.

Yomi · « **Reply #38 on:** 02/06/2009 09:14:02 »

But you didn't say the complete thing so hard thing for us is to belive you so If u don't put full info then don't use hints .........it really confuses, and affects the people viewing thread just see a hint which is nothing to understand in that .......

Raghavendra · « **Reply #39 on:** 02/06/2009 11:11:21 »

ok i will explain

who will invent infinity value ?

Raghavendra (OP)

Raghavendra (OP)

Raghavendra (OP)