0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Why are there so many people asking about this double slit experiment?
nicky asked the Naked Scientists: The conclusion for the double split experiment was that particles behavedifferently when 'being observed' - ie it was mysteriously just the ACTof us OBSERVING that changes particle behaviour. Is it not possible that it was the observing APPARATUS ITSELF that was interfering with the particle behaviour & therefore the experiment ? How exactly did they detect the respective particles (photons/electrons)- what type of apparatus did they use? No one ever questions this?What do you think?
The core idea is to read the theory as a theoretical account of the way distinct physical systems affect each other when they interact (and not of the way physical systems "are")
I have problems understanding the hologram theory. It sounds absurd. But I guess it deserves the benefit of a doubt.So 3D doesn't exist? This isn't science.
Hologram theory in what sense? Are you questioning how holograms work, or the idea that every fragment of anything contains a representation of everything?