The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. That CAN'T be true!
  4. Infinity?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down

Infinity?

  • 53 Replies
  • 29368 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Andrew K Fletcher

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2333
  • Activity:
    0%
  • KIS Keep It Simple
Re: Infinity?
« Reply #20 on: 24/05/2005 10:24:50 »
I believe that we have not even begun to appreciate what is out there. The universe is so vast that there are countless billions of planets out there with a person just like me typing this at exactly the same time on a naked scientists forum on another internet connection in another galaxy.

Andrew
Logged
Science is continually evolving. Nothing is set in stone. Question everything and everyone. Always consider vested interests as a reason for miss-direction. But most of all explore and find answers that you are comfortable with
 



Offline chimera

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 475
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Infinity?
« Reply #21 on: 24/05/2005 11:17:59 »
quote:
Originally posted by Andrew K Fletcher

a naked scientists forum on another internet connection in another galaxy.



I think they'll find that a registered name. What galaxy exactly were you refering to? We might have to send them a friendly email, or maybe not-so friendly if they persist.

Thanks for the heads-up, anyway.

The living are the dead on holiday.  -- Maurice de Maeterlinck (1862-1949)
Logged
Errare humanum esd.-- Biggus D.
 

Offline simeonie (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 351
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Infinity?
« Reply #22 on: 26/05/2005 21:46:39 »
That is a really good question! The first 3 dimensions are length, width and bredth I think!

----------------------
-__- my website!!!!
http://www.simeonie.co.uk
has forums too!
Think about it! lolz
Logged
----------------------
MY NAME IS NOT REALLY SIMEONIE IT IS SIMON!!!
 

Offline DoctorBeaver

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12653
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
Re: Infinity?
« Reply #23 on: 26/05/2005 22:02:58 »
Should I point out that breadth & width are the same? The 3 Ds are length, depth & breadth[:p]
Logged
 

Offline chimera

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 475
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Infinity?
« Reply #24 on: 27/05/2005 19:37:30 »
Dimensions here are a bit different: they are more like 'parameters', or 'dials' on a machine. They are what is always 'there' in your model. If you talk 3-d, it's indeed l,d & b that are ALWAYS there. And if you need to describe something that is moving, time - the 4th.

But in cosmological models or particles you are not in 3-d or 4-d  space at all. There the true constants, as shown in the previous link, keep 'popping up' in your models. You cannot avoid them, it seems, or do with less.

The living are the dead on holiday.  -- Maurice de Maeterlinck (1862-1949)
Logged
Errare humanum esd.-- Biggus D.
 



Offline DoctorBeaver

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12653
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
Re: Infinity?
« Reply #25 on: 28/05/2005 16:14:29 »
I really wish chimera would stop doing that. It really addles my brain [V]
Logged
 

Offline chimera

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 475
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Infinity?
« Reply #26 on: 28/05/2005 20:21:12 »
Hey who's got the degrees and the 183 or whatever IQ? You know ALL dimensions AND their possible values of cricket, which is nothing to be sniffed at, and this model with only 26 would have you stumped? I'm lost for words - figuratively [:)]

The living are the dead on holiday.  -- Maurice de Maeterlinck (1862-1949)
Logged
Errare humanum esd.-- Biggus D.
 

Offline DoctorBeaver

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12653
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
Re: Infinity?
« Reply #27 on: 28/05/2005 20:38:45 »
Having degrees doesn't make me smart. It just means I can focus & have a good memory. Oh... & that I'm good at bluffing!
Logged
 

Offline chimera

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 475
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Infinity?
« Reply #28 on: 28/05/2005 21:04:36 »
Having mutilated my brain in such a way it will no longer accept cricket-related information does not mean I do not like games, poker is one of my old favs. Gosh, the body-language people exude without them ever knowing it. Psychologists dream, I'd say.

The living are the dead on holiday.  -- Maurice de Maeterlinck (1862-1949)
Logged
Errare humanum esd.-- Biggus D.
 



Offline DoctorBeaver

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12653
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
Re: Infinity?
« Reply #29 on: 28/05/2005 22:39:43 »
A large part of the art of poker is being able to read body language whether you realise you're doing it or not. That & being able to give convincing false signals. I'm rubbish at it, I keep laughing at other people's antics when they're trying to bluff. They sit back trying to look so relaxed (sometimes a tad too relaxed), but watch the muscles at the side of the mouth - twitch, tic, twitch - finger-twiddling, looking at their shoes, smoothing their hair, rubbing their nose & all sorts of other stuff that any1 who knows their business can read a mile off
Logged
 

Offline chimera

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 475
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Infinity?
« Reply #30 on: 30/05/2005 10:58:27 »
Realised last night that when two really good poker players' eyes meet over the table and they have sized each other up for what they are, the other players must be like the well-known 'zombies' from AI-discussions in their eyes,  people who are just going through the motions of the game, thinking they know all there is to know about it, but in fact are largely missing the point.

Kind of Poker Turing test.... [:)]

The living are the dead on holiday.  -- Maurice de Maeterlinck (1862-1949)
Logged
Errare humanum esd.-- Biggus D.
 

Offline simeonie (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 351
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Infinity?
« Reply #31 on: 14/06/2005 18:45:21 »
quote:
And if there is an infinate amount of matter then there is an Infinate amount of Gravity which, surely, would cause the universe to collapse on itself


I know this is an old topic now but thinking about what Dean said (above) Why would there have to be an infinate amount of gravity and an infinate amount of matter, Space is a vacum and if there is no matter when you get REALLY far away from earth then there wouldn't be an infinate amount of matter and an infinate amount of gravity.

----------------------
-__- my website!!!!
http://www.simeonie.co.uk
has forums too!
Think about it! lolz
Logged
----------------------
MY NAME IS NOT REALLY SIMEONIE IT IS SIMON!!!
 

Offline rabeldin

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 37
  • Activity:
    0%
    • http://www.stormloader.com/dickbeldin
Re: Infinity?
« Reply #32 on: 25/06/2005 15:47:12 »
It turns out that

1) The observable universe has a finite diameter. It's just the farthest distance that light could travel since it all started. Anything beyond that is unobservable, so your guess is as good as mine.
2) The vacuum isn't empty at all. Stuff and anti-stuff keep popping out of it.
3) Infinity is a mathematical abstraction and doesn't really describe anything in the real  world.

R A Beldin,
Improbable Statistician
Logged
R A Beldin,
Improbable Statistician
 



Offline simeonie (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 351
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Infinity?
« Reply #33 on: 25/06/2005 20:03:39 »
maybe but what are we to know that when the distance gets further out than we can see maybe it is a TOTAL vacuum

----------------------
-__- my website!!!!
http://www.simeonie.co.uk
has forums too!
Think about it! lolz
Logged
----------------------
MY NAME IS NOT REALLY SIMEONIE IT IS SIMON!!!
 

Offline rabeldin

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 37
  • Activity:
    0%
    • http://www.stormloader.com/dickbeldin
Re: Infinity?
« Reply #34 on: 27/06/2005 02:26:36 »
quote:
Originally posted by simeonie

maybe but what are we to know that when the distance gets further out than we can see maybe it is a TOTAL vacuum

----------------------
-__- my website!!!!
http://www.simeonie.co.uk [nofollow]
has forums too!
Think about it! lolz



The short answer is that we can't know about anything farther out. All we have are guesses.

It takes some effort to get used to the idea that there are questions we will never be able to answer.

R A Beldin,
Improbable Statistician
Logged
R A Beldin,
Improbable Statistician
 

Offline DoctorBeaver

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12653
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
Re: Infinity?
« Reply #35 on: 27/06/2005 05:54:07 »
Apparently it can be shown that statisticians are right 100% of the time! [:D]
Logged
 

Offline simeonie (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 351
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Infinity?
« Reply #36 on: 27/06/2005 21:06:29 »
I think the bottom line is that we will never know the answer to some of these questions until we die and go to heaven (some of us).
 As much as I would love to know now though

----------------------
-__- my website!!!!
http://www.simeonie.co.uk
has forums too!
Think about it! lolz
Logged
----------------------
MY NAME IS NOT REALLY SIMEONIE IT IS SIMON!!!
 



Offline rabeldin

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 37
  • Activity:
    0%
    • http://www.stormloader.com/dickbeldin
Re: Infinity?
« Reply #37 on: 28/06/2005 01:23:24 »
quote:
Originally posted by simeonie

I think the bottom line is that we will never know the answer to some of these questions until we die and go to heaven (some of us).
 As much as I would love to know now though

----------------------
-__- my website!!!!
http://www.simeonie.co.uk [nofollow]
has forums too!
Think about it! lolz



And maybe not even then (assuming we do go somewhere when we die).

R A Beldin,
Improbable Statistician
Logged
R A Beldin,
Improbable Statistician
 

Offline simeonie (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 351
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Infinity?
« Reply #38 on: 29/06/2005 18:30:09 »
erm well when you go to heaven (if your going there) you will know everything

----------------------
-__- my website!!!!
http://www.simeonie.co.uk
has forums too!
Think about it! lolz
Logged
----------------------
MY NAME IS NOT REALLY SIMEONIE IT IS SIMON!!!
 

Offline Sandwalker

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 83
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Infinity?
« Reply #39 on: 15/07/2005 14:25:34 »
If heaven exists then infinity exists!

Or is that to great a step of faith to take.

I remember at eight yrs of age arguing with my mum about the edge of the universe, she saying that there was nothing, and I say that nothing occupied a volume and was therefore something.

I do not think space has to be infinite, remember the balloon analogy, when we blow up the balloon the surface area increases but is still finite but unbounded in its two dimensions.

If we can raise this analogy up to 4 or more dimensions, it may mean that space may be unbounded but finite (and growing).

It may even be a singularity (consider the experience of the photon travelling at C) and what we perceive as dimensions is just that a perception of some change of parameter of said singularity.
Logged
I could not join any group that would have me as a member!
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.923 seconds with 73 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.