[neilep (OP)]

Watch her here !!


 [ Invalid Attachment ]

[neilep (OP)]

Actually, just because IT has the shape of a female is it right to call it ' her ' or ' female ' ?

[Don_1]

Now that's very good, but I still don't think she (it) will be replacing the real thing http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sl7Ww5-J6V4

Oh I don't know though!!!

[neilep (OP)]

Now that's very good, but I still don't think she (it) will be replacing the real thing http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sl7Ww5-J6V4

Oh I don't know though!!!

LOL..I luff the last little twiddly-widdly fally over !!

[Madidus_Scientia]

Actually, just because IT has the shape of a female is it right to call it ' her ' or ' female ' ?

Well people call boats and cars 'her' so why not a robot?

[Make it Lady]

She is very pert!

[DoctorBeaver]

Why was that model carrying a watering can?

I've seen a few of those walking robots and I've noticed that none of them straighten their legs when they walk and that's what makes them so obviously artificial. I assume that's because it's harder to get the balance right with a straight leg. Or is that they're all made with haemorrhoid trouble? Does anyone know for sure?

[Chemistry4me]

I didn't see no watering can

[DoctorBeaver]

I didn't see no watering can

What!!? You can't miss it. Big, green thing in her right hand.

[Chemistry4me]

But I watched the 1.20 odd second video and I couldn't see a water can. []

---------

I've seen a few of those walking robots and I've noticed that none of them straighten their legs when they walk and that's what makes them so obviously artificial. I assume that's because it's harder to get the balance right with a straight leg. Or is that they're all made with haemorrhoid trouble? Does anyone know for sure?

I think they've all got really uncomfortable underwear, so it causes a constant wedgie.

[DoctorBeaver]

But I watched the 1.20 odd second video and I couldn't see a water can. []

---------

In Don's link? It's 13 seconds.

[Chemistry4me]

What link? First you say RD, now you say Don! []

[Chemistry4me]

Oh that link! I thought you meant the first link! []

[DoctorBeaver]

What link? First you say RD, now you say Don! []

I got it wrong and edited my post accordingly.

[DoctorBeaver]

Oh that link! I thought you meant the first link! []

D'OH! I did say "model" not "robot"

[Chemistry4me]

Yeah, sorry Sir, I did not realise. [:I]

[RD]

I've seen a few of those walking robots and I've noticed that none of them straighten their legs when they walk and that's what makes them so obviously artificial. I assume that's because it's harder to get the balance right with a straight leg. Or is that they're all made with haemorrhoid trouble? Does anyone know for sure?

The peculiar gait is due to the insertion of many D-cell batteries . []

[Bored chemist]

It's described by the BBC as a "Life-like walking female robot". OK, I accept it's a robot that walks; but in what meaningfull sense it it lifelike or female?

BTW,re "The peculiar gait is due to the insertion of many D-cell batteries ." where? or does that answer part of my earlier question?

[DoctorBeaver]

If they're inserted into the back passage then that would certainly account for the odd gait!

[Chemistry4me]

Plus the constant wedgie.