The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Life Sciences
  3. Physiology & Medicine
  4. How efficient is the human body compared to a combustion engine?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

How efficient is the human body compared to a combustion engine?

  • 23 Replies
  • 27764 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline John Chapman (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 602
  • Activity:
    0%
How efficient is the human body compared to a combustion engine?
« on: 22/03/2009 12:32:17 »
How efficient is the human body compared to a combustion engine? How much work could I do if I drank a gallon of biodiesel compared to my car?
 
Logged
 



Offline Chemistry4me

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7705
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
How efficient is the human body compared to a combustion engine?
« Reply #1 on: 23/03/2009 03:40:18 »
I would think a lot lot more efficient.
Logged
 

Variola

  • Guest
How efficient is the human body compared to a combustion engine?
« Reply #2 on: 23/03/2009 08:30:52 »
Quote from: Chemistry4me on 23/03/2009 03:40:18
I would think a lot lot more efficient.

Hmmmm I have no idea about the workings of a combustion engine, or how much energy is wasted. However it does occur that the car does not have an immediate store for energy, that it can use if the tank is empty. We do in the form of glycogen and our bodies plan for the future by glycolysis and the storing of fat in adipose tissue (unfortunately for my bottom!) We also get 4 moles of ATP per mole of glucose used, but we use up 2 to make it, but we are still coming out on top.
Im guessing we beat the biocar.
Logged
 

Offline John Chapman (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 602
  • Activity:
    0%
How efficient is the human body compared to a combustion engine?
« Reply #3 on: 23/03/2009 09:55:54 »
Well, I'm thinking that on a gallon of fuel my car will take me and four friends (and the weight of the car) about 35 miles. If I drank the fuel, got out of the car and started pushing would I get 35 miles before I started dipping into my own fuel reserves? I suspect not.

Btw, the only reason I suggested biodiesel is because it's non toxic for humans to consume. Other than that it was arbitrary.
 
Logged
 

Offline Chemistry4me

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7705
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
How efficient is the human body compared to a combustion engine?
« Reply #4 on: 23/03/2009 09:57:01 »
Have a fiddle around with this. I think it's quite good.
Logged
 



Variola

  • Guest
How efficient is the human body compared to a combustion engine?
« Reply #5 on: 23/03/2009 10:06:14 »
Quote from: Chemistry4me on 23/03/2009 09:57:01
Have a fiddle around with this. I think it's quite good.

27 cartons of Ben& Jerrys or one gallon of fuel... not a difficult choice!!

I wonder what the physiological affects of drinking a gallon of biofule would be..it may not be toxic but I cant imagine it would stay down for very long.
Logged
 

Offline John Chapman (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 602
  • Activity:
    0%
How efficient is the human body compared to a combustion engine?
« Reply #6 on: 23/03/2009 10:21:01 »
Quote from: Chemistry4me on 23/03/2009 09:57:01
Have a fiddle around with this. I think it's quite good.

That's really good.

It says that 1 gallon of gasoline has the same calories as 150 pints of Guinness (my favourite tipple). So if, instead of drinking a gallon of fuel, I just had the pints could I still push the car? I think there can only be one answer:

Who cares? Lets just stay here and drink the beer!

Seriously though, while your link compare the calorific value of food and fuel it doesn't compare the efficiency of the car and the human, which is what this question is all about.
 
Logged
 

Offline Chemistry4me

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7705
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
How efficient is the human body compared to a combustion engine?
« Reply #7 on: 23/03/2009 10:26:12 »
Quote
you will find that a person riding a bicycle at 15 miles per hour (24 km per hour) burns 0.049 calories per pound per minute. So a 175-pound (77-kg) person burns 515 calories in an hour, or about 34 calories per mile (about 21 calories per km).

A gallon of gasoline (about 4 liters) contains about 31,000 calories. If a person could drink gasoline, then a person could ride about 912 miles on a gallon of gas (about 360 km per liter). Considering that a normal car gets about 30 miles per gallon, that's pretty impressive!


http://auto.howstuffworks.com/question527.htm
Logged
 

Offline Chemistry4me

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7705
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
How efficient is the human body compared to a combustion engine?
« Reply #8 on: 23/03/2009 10:27:24 »
Howzat? [:)]
Logged
 



Offline John Chapman (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 602
  • Activity:
    0%
How efficient is the human body compared to a combustion engine?
« Reply #9 on: 23/03/2009 11:14:53 »
Hi Chem

That's better but it's still not a direct comparison because the person is carrying less weight. I suppose what we really need to know is how many miles to the gallon the cyclist could get if he was towing the car.

If anyone can find a link for that, you can!
Logged
 

Variola

  • Guest
How efficient is the human body compared to a combustion engine?
« Reply #10 on: 23/03/2009 11:31:52 »
Quote from: John Chapman on 23/03/2009 11:14:53
Hi Chem

That's better but it's still not a direct comparison because the person is carrying less weight. I suppose what we really need to know is how many miles to the gallon the cyclist could get if he was towing the car.

If anyone can find a link for that, you can!

I think there are too many variables, some people are better at lowering energy consumption than others, some people weight more or less, more energy is used whie running than while walking ect. Same applies to cars with weight and energy consumption.
The mechanisms for the car to carry its weight is different to that of the cyclist, we rely on muscle weight that is attuned only to carry our weight plus a reasonably defined maximum. Therefore our energy consumption is set at the same rate needed. To tow a car would therefore set the rate much higher, and not what we were built for, so its an unfair comparison. Unless you get the car to tow a lorry. 
Logged
 

Offline John Chapman (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 602
  • Activity:
    0%
How efficient is the human body compared to a combustion engine?
« Reply #11 on: 24/03/2009 01:18:42 »
Quote from: Variola on 23/03/2009 10:06:14

I wonder what the physiological affects of drinking a gallon of biofuel would be..it may not be toxic but I cant imagine it would stay down for very long.

I know the answer to this point.

I actually make biodiesel from used cooking oil. When it's finished, if the quality is good it should be crystal clear and look a bit like apple juice. One of the final quality control tests is to put a jamjar of bio in the fridge overnight and if it's still clear in the morning that shows it contains no moisture.

I have a teenage son who is at that age where he is a bit cocky, especially in front of his mates.

Anyway, one day I dared him to drink one of the jars of bio if I drank a different one first. All his mates were there egging him on and he just couldn't refuse without losing face. So I took one from the fridge, drank it down enthusiastically and banged the empty jar on the table with a loud smack of the lips and a satisfied "aaaaah". Having seen how easy it was he picked up his jar and, smirking, began to drink. His expression soon changed first to distaste then to disgust and eventually to horror when he realised he still had three quarters of the jar to go. Encouraged by his mates he bravely battled through about two thirds of the contents before giving up.

"I reckon you need a drink of apple juice to take away the taste" I said, getting out a carton of juice and filling my empty jar. It looked identical to the jars of biodiesel and I noticed him looking at it quizzically. I gave him a "cheers" gesture and drank it down quickly, smacking my lips and banging down the empty jay with a loud "aaaaah", deliberately mimicking the first time round. I could actually see the penny dropping and he stared at me silently for about 20 seconds before running to the bathroom shouting "bastard" as he left the room.

So in reply to your comment "I cant imagine it would stay down for very long" the answer is about four minutes. [xx(]
Logged
 

Offline Chemistry4me

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7705
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
How efficient is the human body compared to a combustion engine?
« Reply #12 on: 24/03/2009 03:48:09 »
Quote from: John Chapman on 23/03/2009 11:14:53
Hi Chem

That's better but it's still not a direct comparison because the person is carrying less weight. I suppose what we really need to know is how many miles to the gallon the cyclist could get if he was towing the car.

If anyone can find a link for that, you can!
Oh, I didn't realise that was what you were asking.
Logged
 



Offline Chemistry4me

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7705
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
How efficient is the human body compared to a combustion engine?
« Reply #13 on: 24/03/2009 10:17:47 »
I'll try and find something when I've got the time John Chapman.
Logged
 

Variola

  • Guest
How efficient is the human body compared to a combustion engine?
« Reply #14 on: 24/03/2009 11:35:18 »
Quote
So in reply to your comment "I cant imagine it would stay down for very long" the answer is about four minutes. dead

Thats had me in stitches!!!!!! One up for the parents I think!!!  [;D]
Logged
 

Offline John Chapman (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 602
  • Activity:
    0%
How efficient is the human body compared to a combustion engine?
« Reply #15 on: 25/03/2009 10:19:19 »
Quote from: Chemistry4me on 24/03/2009 10:17:47

I'll try and find something when I've got the time John Chapman.


Nobody's addressed me by my full name since my Mum caught me tying up the girl next door. Mind you I was 36 at the time!

Have I been told off? I didn't mean to sound ungrateful or demanding. Both of your external links have been excellent. You do have a knack for finding good external links.  [:)]
 
Logged
 

Offline Chemistry4me

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7705
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
How efficient is the human body compared to a combustion engine?
« Reply #16 on: 25/03/2009 10:21:05 »
Haven't you noticed that I address everyone by their full names? [:)]

And you thought you were special, ohhhh...
Logged
 



Offline John Chapman (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 602
  • Activity:
    0%
How efficient is the human body compared to a combustion engine?
« Reply #17 on: 25/03/2009 10:24:40 »
So where's this bloody link, then.
Logged
 

Offline Chemistry4me

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7705
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
How efficient is the human body compared to a combustion engine?
« Reply #18 on: 25/03/2009 10:25:59 »
Quote from: John Chapman on 25/03/2009 10:19:19
Nobody's addressed me by my full name since my Mum caught me tying up the girl next door. Mind you I was 36 at the time!
What do you call this then? [:)]

Quote from: Chemistry4me on 08/03/2009 02:58:21
Errr... that was John Chapman. [:)]

Quote from: Chemistry4me on 03/03/2009 02:47:34
Oh please John Chapman, don't you start! [;)]

Quote from: Chemistry4me on 06/03/2009 21:27:14
Quote from: John Chapman on 06/03/2009 00:30:29
But you must have noticed the smell of cooked cabbage or brussel sprouts? There's some sort of chemical reaction going on here such as some volatile compound which is being created as the vegetables are being cooked. Any ideas?
I've noticed this John Chapman! [:)]

--------
Although I am not sure about it smelling like cat poo!  [xx(]

Quote from: Chemistry4me on 17/03/2009 10:01:37
Thanks Brad John Chapman. [;)]
Now I'll just see what other people have to say, if they decide to say it that is. [:)]
Logged
 

Offline Chemistry4me

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7705
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
How efficient is the human body compared to a combustion engine?
« Reply #19 on: 25/03/2009 10:26:42 »
Quote from: John Chapman on 25/03/2009 10:24:40
So where's this bloody link, then.
Sorry, too busy search for your name on Google. [:)]
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 1.305 seconds with 67 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.