The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. That CAN'T be true!
  4. Is graphology really an -ology?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Is graphology really an -ology?

  • 6 Replies
  • 4127 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Robert Lee

  • First timers
  • *
  • 6
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Is graphology really an -ology?
« on: 22/03/2009 19:30:02 »
Robert Lee  asked the Naked Scientists:
   
Dear Naked Scientist,

First off, I found you through the [relatively non-commercial] site b3ta.com; and I must say it makes a change from the majority of news agencies' science sections, which mostly consist of "ZOMG, ASTEROID DEATH!" etc. whilst still being something light for listening to during off-hours.  However, aside from the thanks my question is as to Graphology.

I have in the past attended "The Language Show" at the London Olympia, and amongst the many talks on accents, etymology, tasting sessions for languages as well as attempts to garner as many freebies as is possible from the many different stalls (liberal nationalist Romanian music from the 1920s, hurrah!) there was one lecture on Graphology.  Due possibly to the limited time available for the talk there were many questions left unanswered by everyone who attended and the science behind Graphology seemed wobbly at best.

The question is is Graphology truly an ology?  How can one quantify the accuracy of its claims?  As it has only recently been developed and so is still in an early stage of calibration (or so was claimed) how can any of the conclusions be reliable, considering that definitions of certain handwriting characteristics are still open to interpretation (cynically read as:  Graphologists can change their mind about anything at any time)?  If the matter of the study of handwriting is of interest to you then I would look forward to hearing it discussed, however briefly, in the show.  If you wish to investigate Graphology then I am perfectly willing to be used as a guinea pig (i.e. Handwriting samples, psychologists' reports, etc.)


(Also, for the newbielink:http://www.thenakedscientists.com/HTML/podcasts/ [nonactive] dated 15.03.09 there is the point of a study of hair on the thigh.  A slightly related note is that I've found if I get a shiver then I feel it through my head, neck, forearms and lower legs, but not my thighs.  I am male.  This may be something one could investigate by slipping in to everyday conversation, say, on the bus.)

Yours in gratitude,
Robert Lee

What do you think?
Logged
 



lyner

  • Guest
  • Best Answer
  • Is graphology really an -ology?
    « Reply #1 on: 22/03/2009 22:33:13 »
    it goes with astrology!
    Logged
     

    Offline RD

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 8883
    • Activity:
      4%
    • Thanked: 138 times
      • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Is graphology really an -ology?
    « Reply #2 on: 22/03/2009 23:00:44 »
    Is the process of identifying handwriting, (e.g. forged signatures), also pseudo-science  ?
    Logged
     

    Offline Bored chemist

    • Naked Science Forum GOD!
    • *******
    • 16236
    • Activity:
      100%
    • Thanked: 372 times
      • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Is graphology really an -ology?
    « Reply #3 on: 23/03/2009 20:16:10 »
    This
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Questioned_Document_Examination
    is science. It gets used in court.
    This
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphology
    is sh** and is used to exploit gullible pepople and organisations.
    Logged
    Please disregard all previous signatures.
     

    Offline Robert Lee

    • First timers
    • *
    • 6
    • Activity:
      0%
      • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Is graphology really an -ology?
    « Reply #4 on: 24/03/2009 14:03:41 »
    It seems I've been effectively press-ganged into joining the forum; so I thought I'd go along with it and say thanks for the replies so far!

    I was writing in reference to Graphology in specific as opposed to Questioned Document Examination; I'm pretty sure the latter has a lot going for it.

    A next question would be does anyone have first hand or reliable experience of experiments whereby Graphology has been shown to have very little supporting evidence?  Just so you don't think I'm sponging off and doing none of the work myself I am checking out the studies referenced by wikipedia.

    Next, in reference to Sophiecentaur, could we use an astrologist to predict the definition of a graphologist?  That needs more investigation, for sure.
    « Last Edit: 24/03/2009 14:05:25 by Robert Lee »
    Logged
     



    Offline Bored chemist

    • Naked Science Forum GOD!
    • *******
    • 16236
    • Activity:
      100%
    • Thanked: 372 times
      • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Is graphology really an -ology?
    « Reply #5 on: 24/03/2009 19:49:02 »
    "could we use an astrologist to predict the definition of a graphologist? "
    You could, but don't use a Sagitarian- they aren't very good at it.
    Logged
    Please disregard all previous signatures.
     

    lyner

    • Guest
  • Best Answer
  • Is graphology really an -ology?
    « Reply #6 on: 24/03/2009 20:10:55 »
    I considered introducing Uranus into the argument but thought better of it.

    The idea of identifying or eliminating someone as the source of a bit of handwritten text is worth taking seriously. The rest is very tenuous and I wouldn't spend money on it.

    Logged
     



    • Print
    Pages: [1]   Go Up
    « previous next »
    Tags:
     

    Similar topics (2)

    Ology

    Started by Ottehg StarBoard Chemistry

    Replies: 2
    Views: 3504
    Last post 24/01/2006 20:54:27
    by DocN
    Zoology: Is it pronounced 'Zoo-ology' or 'Zo-ology'?

    Started by DemocritusBoard Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution

    Replies: 19
    Views: 40540
    Last post 15/04/2009 12:56:39
    by Don_1
    There was an error while thanking
    Thanking...
    • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
      Privacy Policy
      SMFAds for Free Forums
    • Naked Science Forum ©

    Page created in 0.177 seconds with 49 queries.

    • Podcasts
    • Articles
    • Get Naked
    • About
    • Contact us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Policy
    • Subscribe to newsletter
    • We love feedback

    Follow us

    cambridge_logo_footer.png

    ©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.