What the fek happened here? :D

Chemistry4me · « **on:** 14/04/2009 02:17:35 »

This is a conspiracy: [

] [

]

[ Invalid Attachment ]

[ Invalid Attachment ]

Karen W. · « **Reply #1 on:** 14/04/2009 02:51:27 »

Hey...who's Dom Cabos....!ey No fair I worked hard to get their!!! Lol...lol.... There is a bug in our mist! and then look at Im a geek.... what?

? [:0] [:0]

Chemistry4me · « **Reply #2 on:** 14/04/2009 02:53:34 »

He's got more than 75 times the total posts on this forum! [

]
He's got 'I am a geek!!' number of posts!
Strangly enough, when you view his posts, there are none!

Karen W. · « **Reply #3 on:** 14/04/2009 03:04:59 »

Someone is messing with the stats!

Chemistry4me · « **Reply #4 on:** 14/04/2009 03:16:28 »

He must really be a geek! How on Earth does he do that?

Karen W. · « **Reply #5 on:** 14/04/2009 03:57:09 »

I don't get how he has done this but I have an idea!

Chemistry4me · « **Reply #6 on:** 14/04/2009 04:03:46 »

Oooooo, an idea! Let's see!

Karen W. · « **Reply #7 on:** 14/04/2009 06:31:05 »

well That came up all screwy too, and pointed to other forum members again.......

So any bright ideas.....

Chemistry4me · « **Reply #8 on:** 14/04/2009 06:47:10 »

Well, I think the first question we should answer is: Did dom_cabos intend to do this? Or is it simply something wrong with the system?

Karen W. · « **Reply #9 on:** 14/04/2009 07:54:15 »

with all the names I pulled up I think something is amuck in the system! I am sure Dave wil fix it! He's the man! give it to Dave he fixes everything! Lol..

daveshorts · « **Reply #10 on:** 14/04/2009 11:59:51 »

I think it is more likely to be a bug, a post was deleted that hadn't originally been counted so he went into negative numbers of posts. The variable that counts the numbers of posts isn't designed to have negative numbers so it rolled over to its largest number.

I will regenerate the forum stats which should fix the problem

Chemistry4me · « **Reply #11 on:** 14/04/2009 12:01:13 »

Ha, so 16777215 is the max eh? Strange number I must say.

daveshorts · « **Reply #12 on:** 14/04/2009 12:04:49 »

it is 2^24 -1

so the largest integer you can represent with 3 bytes

Chemistry4me · « **Reply #13 on:** 14/04/2009 12:10:45 »

Wow, I learn something new everyday! [

]

blakestyger · « **Reply #14 on:** 14/04/2009 12:16:02 »

Quote from: Chemistry4me on 14/04/2009 12:10:45

Wow, I learn something new everyday! []

You're lucky - I have to relearn stuff every day. [

]

Karen W. · « **Reply #15 on:** 14/04/2009 21:28:13 »

Quote from: daveshorts on 14/04/2009 11:59:51

I think it is more likely to be a bug, a post was deleted that hadn't originally been counted so he went into negative numbers of posts. The variable that counts the numbers of posts isn't designed to have negative numbers so it rolled over to its largest number.

I will regenerate the forum stats which should fix the problem

Thanks Dave!!! Yayyyyyyyyyy!!!!

Chemistry4me · « **Reply #16 on:** 15/04/2009 08:21:21 »

Yeah, thanks for fixing those stats.

Make it Lady · « **Reply #17 on:** 15/04/2009 17:57:26 »

Why are you using 3 bytes. Most people use 2 or 4. You odd little man.

Chemistry4me · « **Reply #18 on:** 02/12/2009 04:22:39 »

Er... dear Dave, can you please put on your thinking cap and regenerate those stats again? There's another geek lurking in there.

Nizzle · « **Reply #19 on:** 03/12/2009 12:12:15 »

Won't be the last one now they know how to do it

What the fek happened here? :D

Chemistry4me (OP)

Chemistry4me (OP)

Chemistry4me (OP)

Chemistry4me (OP)

Chemistry4me (OP)

Chemistry4me (OP)

Chemistry4me (OP)

blakestyger

Chemistry4me (OP)

Chemistry4me (OP)